Saturday, July 22, 2006

Next wave of travel websites feels like MySpace

July 20, 2006 | HotelMarketing.com

Exploring the mysteries of an exotic vacation spot can be part of the adventure. But for most travelers, the more they know before they go, the better they feel.

Only a few years back, the big travel aggregators on the Web, such as Travelocity, Expedia, and Orbitz, revolutionized travel by putting a lot more information in the hands of travelers. But now a raft of new Internet companies are trying to give even more power to the people, providing them with deeper and more specific information. “Travel 2.0,” or the second wave of travel sites on the Web, is doing it in part by harnessing the same Web 2.0 “social networking” resources that have made websites such as MySpace.com an Internet phenomenon.

“We feel like it’s going to be a tremendously disruptive time. We think it’s going to change who the players are” in online travel, says John Bray, a vice president at PhoCusWright Inc., an independent travel and tourism research firm in Sherman, Conn., that has spent the past 13 years closely watching how the travel industry uses the Internet. “It’s going to stimulate a lot of positive change because anything that empowers consumers is great for business.”

For example, TripAdvisor.com, which bills itself as the largest travel community in the world (3.5 million registered users), is plopped squarely in the middle of the Travel 2.0 camp, says spokesman Brooke Ferencsik.

Its motto, “real stories from real travelers,” gets to the heart of the matter: Much of the content is provided by those who visit the site and share their experiences. The material goes far beyond simply rating a hotel or resort. In forums, for example, visitors can discuss all aspects of a destination with others who have been there or are planning a trip.

Tuesday, July 18, 2006

Naughty or Nice SEO?

BY P.J. Fusco | December 21, 2005

The chasm between sites that are naughty and nice, as far as search engines are concerned, is growing. Some companies' goods and services are naturally worthy of top search listings. Other companies will earn a lump of coal in their proverbial stockings when it comes to search engine referrals this holiday season.

What will your company do to bring more prequalified, natural search traffic to your site in the New Year?

Perhaps a little story can help send your company on a path to improving your site's search engine performance in 2006 and beyond. Consider, gentle readers, a tale of how two companies pursued different paths on the road to top search engine positioning.

Earning Search Traffic

Company A's goods and services are naturally worthy of top search listings. The company took the time and made the investment to create unique, rich Web content. It regularly updates the content, organizes it in a hierarchical manner, and manages the content in a search-engine friendly way free from frames, dynamic page generation, and session IDs.

The company's goods and services deserves top search results for relevant keywords and keyword phrases because the site was designed to be nice to the search enginesand to provide desirable good and services to its target market.

The company's site is easy to crawl and index, so search bots return to it repeatedly, efficiently noting all that's new and relevant to the site's search engine positioning. Over time, a pattern emerges; other sites link back to the good, fresh content the company provides on its Web site. The site grows page depth and becomes a trusted online authority, garnering its fair share of customers and clients from the marketplace.

The price the company pays to maintain its search engine traffic diminishes over time because the company invested in building a long-term search marketing strategy. It's not very sexy, and top search positioning isn't attained overnight. Yet the company's profits from search engine traffic continue to grow at a healthy pace month after month.

Driving Search Traffic

Company B loathes the fact its rivals' Web sites that offer similar goods and services have better search positioning than its own sites. The company borrows other people's content. In so doing, it confuses search engine algorithms into believing its sites are relevant for highly competitive, profitable keywords and keyword phrases.

To obtain top search positioning, the company builds Web sites that show search bots something different from what visitors see. The company stuffs, stacks, and hides keywords and links in alternative tags, hidden fields, and layers of code. Search referral traffic spikes, then quickly diminishes.

The company produces page after page of duplicate content and mirrors its Web sites across a series of domain names. All the company's sites were once quickly crawled. But they failed to change over time, so search bots return less frequently. To fix the problem, the company swaps other people’s content for its own. Search referral traffic spikes again, then slows to a trickle.

The company decides to use the old sites to redirect unsuspecting visitors through hundreds of doorway page to a series of similar sites. In a short time, a large influx of links point to some of the sites to keep them in top positions. But a back-link pattern begins to emerge, connecting the sites to link farms, guest books, and ad-scraping blogs. Once again, search engine traffic begins to erode.

The price the company pays to maintain its top positioning increases over time because it must keep building new sites to engender short-term bursts in search-referred traffic. Yet as long as search referred traffic keeps coming, the company continues to profit.

Dumb Bots, Smart Strategies

Both the naughty and nice companies in this story attain top search engine positioning because search bots aren't particularly sophisticated. But because search engines continue to refine their algorithms to index more relevant results, only one company will maintain its top search engine positioning in a cost-effective manner over an extended period.

Nearly anyone can temporarily fool search bots into indexing a site for something it's not. It's equally possible to create relevant, well-organized content searchers actively seek. That's why the SEM (define) industry is inhabited by characters referred to as white hats, black hats, and gray hats; each hat color aligns with its preferred method of optimization wizardry.

To the average searcher, top search positioning is considered to be a direct reflection of the organization that attained the results. There's really only one question a company must answer before initiating an organic SEM initiative: what price are you willing to pay for top organic search results?

When you initiate an organic SEM initiative, you hang your company's reputation out on the Web. Your reputation is based on the tactics you're willing to employ to attain top results. Match your company's reputation with your SEM strategy if you truly desire to earn -- and keep -- your search-referred customers.

SEO For The Big Three

By Dave Davies | Published 12/14/2005



Ranking your website highly on one of the “big three” search engines (Google, Yahoo or MSN) is a daunting task let alone ranking your website highly on all three.Three engines, three algorithms, three different sets of rules - and yet there are websites out there that have first page rankings across them all – how do they do it?

While all of the major search engines use different algorithms the end goal of all three is the same:to provide the searcher with the most relevant results available.It is this one common thread that makes it possible for an SEO to rank a website highly across all the major engines.While there are a variety of factors at play and an even wider variation in the weight each of these factors are given– the possible variations that can produce relevant results are limited.

For example, if inbound links are given 0% weight then insignificant sites will ranki highly for high-competition phrases.Many reputable companies such as Microsoft could lose rankings for their own names so links must and will always hold value.On the other hand, if links were to hold 100% weight then sp@mming the search engines would be a simple matter and so there are a limited number of possible variables in between these extremes that this factor can have, no matter which engine we are optimizing for.

That said, there are still three main engines with three distinct algorithms despite common requirements.To clarify how to optimize for all of them it's easiest to discuss them individually first.Due to the way their algorithms work one is best to expect rankings on MSN first, followed by Yahoo! and finally Google (I am assuming that the phrase is of at least moderate competition).For this reason we will discuss them individually in that order.

SEO For MSN

Proper SEO for MSN requires that a site be structured well with a distinct theme throughout and many inbound links.The advantage an SEO has while optimizing a site for MSN is that MSN tends to pick up and credit new content and inbound links very quickly.That means that with the right tactics in place one can rank a website relatively quickly on this important engine.

While MSN has the lowest number of searches performed on it, ComScore's report back in July revealed that MSN searchers were also 48% more likely to purchase a product or service online than the average Internet user.A very important statistic for website owners that sell online.

To rank highly on MSN one needs to build a solid sized site (exactly how large will depend on your industry – look at the size of your competitor's sites for an idea), a relevant theme throughout the site that focuses on your primary keywords and a good number of links.MSN doesn't (at this time) employ an aging delay on links such as the one employed by both Google and Yahoo! so the effects of the site and inbound links can be picked up very quickly and with good SEO efforts one can rank well within a few months on MSN for competitive phrases.

SEO For Yahoo!

Until recently Yahoo! acted very much like MSN, now it's leaning a bit more towards Google.Ranking a website well on Yahoo! requires a solid-sized site with unique content and a very good number of links.

While PageRank is a Google factor, Yahoo! does have some type of page value factor at play.Many moons ago Yahoo! was playing with a PageRank-like calculation called WebRank.They even went so far as to put out a beta toolbar testing it.This indicates that there is a factor at play in the Yahoo! algorithm similar to Google's PageRank – they just don't advertise what a specific page's value is.

Yahoo! is placing a large amount of emphasis on the age of links though not in the same way that Google is.We will get to Google shortly however to understand what to expect from Yahoo! one must understand that when you get a link to your website it won't hold it's full value for a number of months.While the exact number of months in unknown it appears to be around 8 before it hold it's full weight though it will hold some from day one and this weight will increase as time passes.

To rank well on Yahoo! you much optimize your site similar to what you would do for MSN and you must build a large number of inbound links and have patience as these links age.You will not see a sudden spike 2 weeks after a large link-building campaign, you will likely have to wait 3-4 months to notice any significant effect.

SEO For Google

Virtually every webmaster and website owner is primarily concerned about attaining Google rankings due to the significantly higher number of searchers using it.Provided that you are building your website following the best practices of SEO (i.e. unique content, a sizable amount of content, and a good number of incoming links) then your rankings are sure to follow, however due to their aging delay it will likely take longer than on MSN or Yahoo!Google considers the age of your links, your domain and even the individual page to be a factor and the longer your page has been online the better.

Essentially, ranking a site on Google requires that you take the same actions as for the other two, continue your link building efforts on an ongoing basis to insure that you end up with more-and-more links, and that you update your content and add content on a fairly regular basis (though the addition of a blog for example).

Tying It Together

The logical process for a new website or one at the first stages of SEO is to first target MSN.At this point you can focus your attention on continuing to build high-quality, relevant links to and content on your site which will continue to increase your value on Yahoo! and Google.

Analysis will be required to determine exactly what weight you will be giving to different areas.For example, if your onsite factors are optimized for MSN then you know that you will need to make up for this in the offsite factors for Yahoo! and Google.If you figured you would need 100 links to rank on Google then you will now need to up that number to account for the fact that you have optimized your site itself for a different engine.

During the analysis process you will likely want to use a tool to speed up the process of keyword density analysis and competitor link analysis.At Beanstalk we use a tool called Total Optimizer Pro though there are others out there (note: I have yet to find one that does what this one does as quickly and easily).

Conclusion

I am hoping that none of you read the title and were expecting to rank on the first page of all three major engines next week.Ranking highly on all three major engines takes time, patience and a good few rounds of tweaking to get the perfect balance of onsite and offsite optimization.Of course, as you can gather, done properly it's well worth the effort.

Weaving Relevant Keywords Into Your Site

BY P.J. Fusco | February 1, 2006

Last time, I discussed how to prepare a list of relevant keywords and keyword phrases to help increase natural search traffic to a Web site. Today, we'll look at how to weave these keywords and keyword phrases throughout a Web site. But first, let's review a site's architecture.

When building a Web site, one of the first steps is to organize the site's underlying structure. A Web site must be flexible and organized in a way that makes day-to-day housekeeping and long-term maintenance efficient and manageable.

File That, Please

Most Web sites use a hierarchical directory structure to separate and organize flat HTML files within it. Individual files should have easily identifiable names. Once a file name and its location are established, they shouldn't be changed.

Some Web sites contain only a few files and require a relatively simple architecture. Others are large and require a more sophisticated structure. Large or small, well-optimized sites adhere to specific naming conventions to ensure all information is readily accessible to search bots and spiders.

The deeper you bury keyword rich content, the less likely search engines will find it. Some search engine spiders won't go deeper than a certain number of subdirectories. A hierarchical directory with a flat file structure, in which the numbers of slashes in the URL are minimized, will help ensure more pages of your site are indexed. Subdomains within the site can be equally well optimized.

Let's look at tax-form site, for example. If the company domain name is taxforms.com, then a good way to set up a site architecture is:

* www.taxforms.com/w-2.html

* www.taxforms.com/1099.html

* www.taxforms.com/1099-misc.html

* www.taxforms.com/1099-dividens.html

Or like this:

* w-2.taxforms.com

* 1099.taxforms.com

* 1099-misc.taxforms.com

* 1099-dividens.taxforms.com

A couple things happen when you build a site in such a manner. You get the keywords you want high up in the URL string, and you can leverage optimized anchor text for navigational purposes throughout the site and, of course, in a site map.

Either site architecture works well in all search engines, especially Yahoo! and MSN. However, it will still take highly relevant page content to rank well for specific keywords and keyword phrases in the major search engines (along with high-quality links into the site).

Xenu's Link Sleuth is a very handy tool that can provide you with an overview of your Web site, as well as other helpful details about the overall site structure. Two of the more helpful views include detailed listings of a site's URLs and page titles.

On the Page

The text within an individual Web page title (generally used in the meta details behind the page as a title tag) is accorded weight by the search engines than nearly any other text on the page.

Keywords at the beginning of the title tag are given the most weight. By leading with keywords carefully chosen for specific Web pages, you can make each site page more relevant for keywords and keyword phrases used in popular Web searches.

There are six heading tags, H1 through H6, in basic HTML coding. The search engines consider H1 tags to be more significant than the rest of the body copy. Text within an H1 tag weighs more than text within a H2 tag, which weighs more than text within a H3 tag, and so on.

Some Web developers believe H1 tags are unsightly on the page -- large, bold text that distracts from the overall site design. This needn't be the case. The H1 tag's font, size, color, and surrounding white space can all be defined using style sheets to complete the site design.

It's relatively easy, but time consuming, to marry specific keywords and keyword phrases to different pages throughout your Web site. Remember, you never get more than two indexed listings for any page for a particular topic in the search engines. You must target specific pages for optimization based on your keyword research and site metrics.

Next, you must ensure each optimized page's body copy is adequately long and keyword rich. If at all possible, incorporate at least 250 to 300 words on each page so the search engines have enough content to determine the page's theme.

Include relevant keywords, particularly near the top of the page, as search engines weigh these words more heavily. Optimal keyword density is a highly debated topic. Generally speaking, 5 to 8 percent keyword density in body copy is ideal. But be careful not to go overboard, or your copy won't read well. Body copy must be useful to visitors if it's to be relevant to search engines.

It's also important hypertext links pointing to various site pages include your targeted keywords and keyword phrases as assigned to specific Web pages. Most major search engines still weigh link anchor text as highly relevant to the page being linked to. It's best to keep text links relatively succinct; the longer the link text, the more diluted the theme.

More to Come

A site's architecture, file structure, and content can be woven together to incorporate keywords and keyword phrases that are relevant and important to your business. Yet we've only covered several core SEO (define) fundamentals essential to improving your site's search referrals and overall Web visibility.

Next, a few more behind-the-page SEO techniques to help further encourage increased search-referred traffic to your site.

Ten E-Business Proverbs for 2006

BY Bryan Eisenberg | January 20, 2006

2005 was a great year for e-business.

Goldman, Sachs & Co., Nielsen//NetRatings, and Harris Interactive Inc. reported online sales grew 30 percent year over year this holiday season. That's great news. If you were one of the businesses that experienced this level of growth (or better), your online business should get lots more attention in 2006. On the downside, you'll be challenged to hit some lofty growth goals.

A few weeks ago, I shared some thoughts and advice on what you should work on in 2006. This week, I want to share some profound wisdom from my friend Sam Decker, former e-commerce and customer-centricity leader at Dell. Decker recently joined Bazaarvoice, a new company providing managed technology and services to bring word of mouth closer to a company's online experience (it's still in stealth mode, and, in full disclosure, I'm an advisor to the company).

Bottom line: when it comes to online success, Decker knows what he's talking about. He spent seven years at Dell, four of them leading the consumer site, Dell.com, to double conversion annually in the midst of a struggling PC industry and online sales slowdown after the dot-com crash. By 2003, Dell's consumer online sales reached $3.5 billion, making it the largest e-commerce site (according to comScore).

For several years, I've tapped Decker's expertise and shared his advice in this column as well as my recent book, "Call to Action." I asked him to reflect on his 13 years of online experience and share his top 10 principles for lasting e-business success. Like orange juice concentrate, below I've attempted to squeeze in as much of Decker's great ideas on e-business strategy, operations, metrics, and merchandising:

* Drive individual ownership among the company ranks. When you give team members the expectation and autonomy to "own" a goal, they widen their scope and take responsibility for achieving it. There's an entrepreneur in everyone. By giving each team member published goals or numbers to hit a week, month, or quarter, they'll quarterback the plays to make it happen. Whether it's in their control or requires collaboration with others, owners are responsible to report on progress weekly and to hold partners accountable. The goal should align to larger e-business goals and objectives so all quarterbacks can see how they fit into the larger picture.

* Narrow team focus. In e-business, there are 100 plates to spin. That spreads a team thin. Sometimes at the end of a quarter or year, you realize you just maintained the Web site. A team can achieve strategic breakthroughs if everyone moves in parallel toward a targeted direction. At least once a quarter, align team members to accomplish one to three strategic objectives. Publish dates, owners, and goals that lead to achieving these objectives. Then share and celebrate the accomplishment. True, this is basic management stuff. But it's easily forgotten in the trenches. Without this focus, day-to-day maintenance leads to mediocre results. Besides, it's more fun to look back on big accomplishments.

* Align business with e-business. Many companies keep the Web team in a figurative corner. One company with over 40 percent of revenues in online sales put its online team in another building! E-business is an outward reflection of almost every business function. The best way to get other groups engaged in the online business is to share goals and measures to which they're personally committed. Put online goals in the performance plans of customer service, sales, brand management, finance, IT, and other company functions. Each function can affect your Web site in some way. Don't just align the Web team toward goals, as it takes others to help achieve them. Widen the lens and align the business around your e-business.

* Democratize metrics. How accessible and convenient is it to view your Web analytics? Are they only analyzed by a select few in the company? Bringing a wider set of eyes to the online metrics increases companywide attention to e-business. As a result, more cross-functional partners will participate in moving e-business forward. Whether your Web analytics is outsourced or homegrown, make it easy for everyone to frequently view relevant Web metrics.

* Share Web metric reports. The key to making e-business effective is to make sure everyone's on the same page. Another obvious one, because what company doesn't have reports? But great reporting brings e-business to the forefront and keeps things moving in the right direction. Great Web reports should be accessible; easily understandable outside the Web team; consistently formatted; distributed frequently; presented weekly; and easy to demonstrate impact to the business. Show goals, the status against those goals, and the plans to achieve them. Get Web metrics reported alongside other business reports and operations reviews so executives see the connections. Use these metrics to motivate and align.

Search Sees Double-Digit Growth

By Enid Burns | February 9, 2006

The number of U.S. searches grew 55 percent in December 2005 over December 2004, according to data released by Nielsen//NetRatings.

The growth accounts for 5.1 billion searches conducted in December 2005, up from 3.3 billion searches carried out the previous December. During this time, the U.S. Internet user base increased by just 3 percent to reach 207 million users in the total digital media universe, which includes some non-active users. In December, the number of active home users registered at 143.8 million.

"The growth of search and the role of search in usage of the Internet has been astounding," said Ken Cassar, senior director of analytics at Nielsen//NetRatings. "When you look at search penetration, it's near 80 percent. The number of searches each person generates, it's high. It would be intuitive to say the numbers can't get any bigger than they are, but they've continued nonetheless."

In December, Google searches rose six percentage points to reach a 49 percent share of all searches over the previous December. Yahoo! Search and MSN Search each declined slightly in the percentage of shares they served.

Top Three U.S. Search Share Rankings by Percentage Points, December 2004 and 2005
Search Engine December 2004 Search Share (%) December 2005 Search Share (%) Change (Percentage Points)
Google 43.1 48.8 5.7
Yahoo! 21.7 21.4 -0.3
MSN 14.0 10.9 -3.1
Source: Nielsen//NetRatings, February 2006

The number of searches isn't a factor in market share. Each of the three search engines experienced double-digit year-over-year growth. Google experienced 75 percent growth, Yahoo! Search went up 53 percent, and MSN Search increased by 20 percent.

"There are a lot of positive things happening in the search space that only lead me to believe people will use it more frequently," said Cassar.

Top Three U.S. Search Engines by Growth in Searches, December 2004 and 2005
Search Engine December 2004 Searches (000) December 2005 Searches (000) Growth (%)
Google 1,414,778 2,475,895 75
Yahoo! 711,857 1,085,918 53
MSN 460,377 553,476 20
Source: Nielsen//NetRatings, February 2006

Nielsen//NetRatings includes panel-based and site-centric Internet audience measurement services.

The Value of Site-Side Analytics and Optimization

BY Jason Burby | February 28, 2006

Most organizations are comfortable investing in online advertising analytics and campaign tuning, but investment in site-side analytics and optimization lags far behind.

Campaign Optimization vs. Site Optimization

There are a few reasons why people tend to gravitate toward optimizing campaigns instead of optimizing their sites:

* Centralized knowledge/decision-making. Online advertising and landing pages often are managed by a single group, or, in some cases, a single person. This makes it easier to evaluate and make changes quickly.

* Need to justify spending. Now that budgets are tighter, the need to justify all spending is a bigger issue. If you spend $50,000 or $5 million on an online campaign, stakeholders want to know how it's performing and need to understand the campaign ROI (define). Everyone has an incentive to maximize that campaign's effectiveness. Its performance is almost certain to be evaluated.

* Ad networks that push performance. Since the ad networks know there's a push for accountability and ROI, they've created tools to help tune banners and landing pages. They know the more effective the campaign, the greater chance of more ad revenue in the future; again, in everyone's best interest.

* Quickly delivered feedback. Campaigns can be a quick, easy way to see the result of changes. By tuning a landing page or a banner call to action, you can see results in lift of click-throughs and sometimes campaign conversion almost immediately.

The Cost of Lost Opportunity

Even though a site may receive heavy traffic as a result of online media, most visitors typically arrive via direct or non-paid search rather than via a landing page or campaign. So although a majority of efforts and resources may focus on tuning campaigns and landing pages and on converting visitors who arrive through those channels, they're usually only a fraction of the audience. I'm not saying don't spend the time on optimizing campaigns and landing pages. Actually, I'm saying just the opposite. Keep doing it if you're doing it, but do the same for the rest of the site.

There are costs tied to both campaigns and the overall site. These may include development, management, hosting, copywriting, and design. Even more important is the opportunity cost that's lost by not converting site visitors when they arrive -- no matter how they get there.

People who access the site directly often behave differently than those who access the site through natural search and ad campaigns. Also, different search strategies and different campaigns often perform very differently.

Look at Traffic and Triggers

Instead of just focusing analysis and optimization efforts on your banners or landing pages or on how visitors coming from banners convert, consider how you can have an impact on your audience overall.

You may find there are different conversion triggers for different segments, personas, and traffic drivers. To know where to focus your efforts, you must first understand overall site traffic and behaviors. This can help you identify the groups or segments with the greatest potential for improved conversion rates.

Don't get too caught up in justifying your ad spending as it relates to the Web site. If you haven't been asked to justify spending on the site or haven't struggled to get budget for site-related items, you probably will soon. Stay ahead of the question and start focusing now!

Check out some of my past columns on identifying, prioritizing, and acting on opportunities to get started on site optimization.

Search-Engine Friendly Content Management Systems

BY Shari Thurow | October 10, 2005

Migrating from a static HTML site to a database-driven Web site poses many challenges, especially if a site already has outstanding search engine traffic. If you purchase a content management system (CMS) that doesn't generate search-engine friendly Web pages, then your site's "natural," or organic, search engine traffic can disappear.

URL Structure

Many people mistakenly believe a content management system is search-engine friendly merely because it generates a search-engine friendly URL (Web address) structure. Below are three examples of URLs that aren't search-engine friendly:

http://www.domain.com/sr/javasr/search.do?
BV_UseBVCookie=Yes&vertical=CLTH&cat=Mens&subcat=
Accessories&displayTarget=Subcategory

http://www.domain.com/cd/fp/prod/0,,
1_2_52358_53887_130435_108992_5:view=-1,00.html?
CM_MERCH=PAGE_52249&sid=6243170865-0088104670

http://www.domain.com/2005/10/01/sports/06detain.html?
hp&ex=1166747600&en=c214ef00a9dh2d91&op=9877&partner=homepage

A better CMS should allow Web site owners to generate a URL structure that makes sense to their target audience, such as the URLs below.

* http://www.domain.com/children/hats/prodid/77898

* http://domain.com/2005/10/05/news/politics/supreme_court/77643

The first URL clearly communicates the Web site sells children's hats. It's probably an e-commerce site. The second URL communicates the Web page contains news about the Supreme Court on 10/5/2005. This site is probably a news or a publisher site.

Certainly, simplifying the URL structure is a huge step in the right direction. I applaud all software developers who keep this in mind as they create and modify their CMSs. However, URL structure is not the only reason a site is search-engine friendly. Other factors must be taken into consideration.

Graphic Images vs. Text Links

As many of you already know, an effective Web site strikes a balance between the use of CSS-formatted text and graphic images. Some Web sites require more graphic images and multimedia files than others due to industry and client expectations. I've found sites in the entertainment or games industries generate more page views per visitor when pages are more graphics intensive.

When I evaluated a number of search-engine friendly design software packages, I was dumbfounded at the overemphasis on text links. It appears the engineers who create this software believe every link on a Web page should be CSS-formatted text.

Furthermore, the page templates were created primarily with search engines in mind, not the end users. What should a category page look like? What does a product page look like? What are the up-sell links, and how are they formatted? What does a reference page look like? Is it a reference page for a small, medium, or large database of terms and definitions?

What became ever clearer to me as I spoke with both sales reps and software engineers is their lack of understanding of visitor behavior. The solution appears to be, "Make every link into a text link. Problem solved."

As a Web designer and developer, I don't need a search-engine friendly CMS to change graphic image links into CSS-formatted links. I can save thousands of dollars and do it myself. I believe most Web pages need some kind of text-link navigation, but I also know when it is and is not appropriate to use text links.

A search-engine friendly CMS should therefore be able to work with both graphic image links and text links. Software developers should focus on creating CMS that help both the Web developer and users first, not software spiders. Some of these so-called search-engine friendly CMSs are nothing but expensive doorway-page generators.

Software Developers As Search Experts

In the SEM/SEO industry or some odd reason, the concept of beginner, intermediate, and advanced SEOs isn't logical. When one becomes an expert in any field, he starts with a basic skill set. An expert becomes an expert through education, training and experience.

In SEO, the primarly beginner-level skill is effective copywriting. At a recent Search Engine Strategies conference, I was particularly amazed that two of my colleagues publicly admitted they weren't good copywriters and didn't have the time for it. In the same breath, they claimed to be expert SEOs. An expert SEO who isn't good at writing search-friendly copy? Sorry guys. You're not an expert if you haven't mastered a basic skill.

An intermediate SEO skill is the ability to code and program user-friendly and search-friendly Web pages. Many SEOs feel usability isn't a skill they need because they format Web sites for search engines, not end users. I believe an intermediate SEO must develop sites that meet user goals, business goals, and search engine goals.

Why did I go into this little rant? Because many developers who create search-engine friendly CMSs are self-proclaimed "experts" who don't possess even basic or intermediate SEO skills.

Conclusion

Before you purchase any CMS, make sure the CMS system generates a user-friendly and spider-friendly URL. If it doesn't, work with the CMS company's technical staff to create workarounds (if possible) so the URL is spider friendly.

Second, don't rely on the CMS company's staff to generate search-engine friendly design templates for you. All too often, these CMS companies don't have usability professionals or truly qualified SEO experts on staff. If your current design templates are effective, they should easily integrate into the CMS with a few modifications.

The best advice I can give anyone is to hire an SEO consultant during the purchasing process. I understand there are many reasons for purchasing a CMS that have nothing to do with SEO. Nonetheless, you can save thousands or even millions of dollars in expenses, advertising and marketing costs, and staff time if you take a proactive approach to search-friendly Web development.

Top 5 E-Mail Marketing Must-Dos for 2006

Source: CMO

How to take your programs to the next level in the coming year.

By Scott Olrich
ADVERTISER

These strategies and tactics will help you maximize your use of the e-mail channel.

1.) E-mail Experiences: The average consumer is exposed to 3,000 ad messages daily, of which they notice 80 and react to 10. How will your e-mails break through the noise? Think about how you can gain entry into the recipient’s inner circle – the 10 to 15 companies whose e-mails they always read. Start by using basic, non-intrusive animations in your e-mails to direct the recipient’s attention to your call-to-action. Include graphic and textual links in your e-mails to complimentary downloads, Web commercials, recorded webinars and push-to-talk technology for richer end user experiences.

2.) E-mail Segmentation: The number-one reason for unsubscribing to e-mail is irrelevant contact. Average e-mail performance metrics will diminish for all subscriber lists over time unless a genuine effort is made to improve customer relevancy. A recent study by JupiterResearch shows that regardless of the attribute used (i.e., purchase behavior, demographics, etc.), any form of segmentation is proven to lift results. Segment your prospect/customer database based on behavior, preferences, demographics, personas, etc. Work toward the ultimate goal of writing e-mail copy to match the tone and style of your matrix of target audience clusters: right message, right person and right time.

3.) E-mail Subscriptions: Scale your existing e-mail program success by accelerating the growth of your master opt-in e-mail database. Start by auditing every customer/prospect touch point. Aggressively leverage Web traffic with quick and easy sign-up forms that require only an e-mail address. Place sign-up forms on high-traffic pages of your website and landing pages (especially to capture search traffic). Also include opt-in messaging deeper in the site on the pages where readers are researching your products and services.

4.) E-mail Testing: Are you making objective (data-driven) or subjective (opinion-based) decisions? Most marketers are relying on their gut to make changes to their e-mail program. The majority are doing no testing whatsoever. Stop gambling with your e-mail program profitability. Test, test, test to get smart on what works and what doesn’t; and remember, you are never completely “done.” It’s also important to refresh your creative on a regular basis. Testing to optimize your e-mail campaigns controls risk and maximizes returns. Testers achieve significantly higher open and click-through rates, and most importantly, higher conversion rates.

5.) E-mail Delivery Audits: An estimated 20 percent of e-mails are blocked or filtered due to firewall and spam filters. These delivery failures are rarely reported by your e-mail delivery system. Work with e-mail deliverability experts or subscribe to a specialized third-party auditing tool to address delivery effectiveness and test for basic rendering. Ask for a comprehensive report that covers content and coding issues (spam triggers), so you can better understand how to get your e-mails delivered to the inbox.

Scott Olrich is the chief marketing officer for Responsys [www.responsys.com], provider of on-demand e-mail and lifecycle marketing solutions, where he leads the strategic direction for all Web-based marketing products and services. Prior to Responsys, Scott was a founding executive and senior vice president at Topica, an e-mail marketing application service provider. Scott was also a senior consultant at Accenture and held senior positions at Xerox Corporation and Spark Online.

Thursday, July 13, 2006

Revenue Management for Dummies

Source: HotelMarketing.com

June 22, 2006
by Neil Salerno

Now don’t get me wrong, I really don’t think any of my readers are dummies, but some of the revenue management articles I’ve read lately have made me feel like a dummy. I’m sure there are many hoteliers that are interested in this topic; I just feel that some ‘experts’ make revenue management more mysterious and complicated than it needs to be for many hotels.

True, many of the articles I’ve read were obviously written to appeal to skilled full-time revenue managers, but how about the many hotels that don’t share the luxury of having someone devoted to revenue management alone. Most hotels have no choice but to assign the tasks of revenue management to their best multi-tasker; usually the GM or front office manager; anyone with a strong interest in numbers and the time to do it.

My concern is for the many medium-sized and smaller properties which can’t afford to hire a revenue management specialist and haven’t yet experienced the results which managing revenue can produce. Many of my clients are owners of smaller independent and franchised hotels who sometimes struggle just to keep the front desk staffed. Revenue management is no less important to them, but they have to make do with what they can afford and what is practical for them.

The airlines were the first, in travel, to realize that the principle of ‘supply and demand’ could be used to maximize revenue. They realized that selling all their seats at high prices was nearly impossible most of the time. They needed some way to fill enough seats to cover expenses; yet have the ability to raise prices after that base is obtained. Thus, the magic 7 day fare was born. Anyone making a reservation more than 7 days, in advance of a flight, got a real deal; after that your reservation is profit and it has worked for them for many years.

The principle is the same for hotels as well. As occupancy demand increases and supply (room availability) decreases, lower rates are closed to sale and only higher rates are available. Hotels today need a base of business in order to cover operational expenses. Selling all one’s rooms at the same rate rarely produces good occupancy or a good average rate.

Let’s examine how hotel rates are determined. Contrary to what some hotel owners may believe, setting rates has little to do with the hotel’s furnishings or design. Hotel room rates are determined by what people will pay for those rooms. I’ve seen many hotel rooms that sell for $150 per night in Florida, which would sell for $500 per night in New York City, for the same room. Occupancy demand is the major difference. Higher demand allows for higher rates, plain and simple.

When developing rates, it’s always a good idea to ‘go-to-school’ on the competition. Hopefully, Smith Travel Research is active in your area; their comp set reports can give you almost everything you need. Their STR report can be the best investment you’ve ever made for your property. Develop your rates as compared to your competition. How does your hotel compare?

For many years, hoteliers have realized that various market segments tolerate different rate levels. Most well-operated hotels set rates by market segment all the way up and down the scale. All rates flow from your highest rack rates down to lower deeply discounted rates.

Once your scale of rates is determined, it’s time to begin setting up revenue management parameters. In their simplest form, rates might look like this:

Rack Rate
Discount 1 (walk-in Corporate)
Discount 2 (Government/Military)
Deep Discount 3 (Segment Discounts)
Deep Discount 4 (Promotional rate)

Please note that AAA or AARP rates are not listed because, as a good business practice, these rate categories are rarely closed out.

Once rates are set for each segment of business, as listed above, the next step is to set desired occupancy levels needed to close each discount level; what is needed to establish a base of business. This example is for a 100 room property.

0 to 50 rooms sold ........all rates are available
51 to 70 rooms sold......close Deep Discount rates
71 to 85 rooms sold......close all rates except Walk-in Corporate and Rack Rates

Please note that rates are not actually increased. As the number of occupied or reserved rooms increase, lower rate categories are closed for sale; in effect, increasing revenue yield. The scales above are very simple; with practice and experience, one can add many more variables to fine-tune rate yield.

Obviously, the same principle can apply to holiday and special event periods as well. The rates may be increased for those periods, but the same scales might apply.

Adding Restrictions

For high demand periods, many hotels add restrictions to increase revenue yield. Some common restrictions, such as minimum stays, closed to arrival, etc. are excellent tools for experienced yield managers. Restrictions should be applied with some caution because they do limit demand.

Daily Practice Creates Perfection

A good practice is to create a yield meeting to include all key individuals in the hotel. To begin, I suggest meeting at least three days per week. Larger properties and properties with full time revenue managers obviously review occupied and reserved rooms every day. The purpose of this meeting is to review reservations for the future to determine which days need attention.

Booking Pace

Booking pace, the rate in which reservations are made for the future, varies throughout the year. If yield meetings are held faithfully, people managing revenue will gain a sense for the pace of bookings. Some careful records-keeping can aid in this process.

Generally, a three day program would include reviewing occupancy as follows: Monday, 30 days out, Wednesday, 60 days out, and Friday, 120 days out. Hotels with group business could go out a year or more every Friday.

Revenue management utilizes intuitive as well as analytical skills; both of these skill sets improve with practice. The mind-set of a good revenue manager or team is focused on producing a good blend of occupancy and average rate. The hotel’s mission should be to build base occupancy, through a good mix of rates, and then take advantage of having a base by then closing-out lower rates to build average rates.

The mission should not simply be to get 100% occupancy; it should be to get occupancy as high as possible, with an average rate as high as possible. For a 100 room property, occupancy of 85% with an average rate of $140 is more profitable than 100% occupancy at $110. Although both scenarios produce roughly the same revenue, what does it cost you to clean 15 rooms?

This is a simplified format for those hotels which are currently ‘simply selling rooms’ at the present time. The purpose of revenue management is to help hotels to ‘shape’ their business. Obviously, there can be much more detail and intricate techniques involved in revenue management; but sometimes progress has to come in baby steps in the beginning.

As stated at the outset of this article, it is true that many larger hotels, franchised and Independent, and some hotel companies have full-time talented revenue managers. However, most independent and smaller hotels are not using any form of revenue management in their operations. Revenue management, even in its simplest form, can benefit most hotels no matter how large or small.

There are other factors which will affect close-out and/or restriction decisions such as occupancy history, overflow pressure from hotels with convention facilities, and special events being held in the area. For properties which may be just beginning to use revenue management in their operation, practice makes perfection. For many hotels, start with the basics. You will find, in short order, many opportunities to become more sophisticated with additional ways to improve your revenue yield.

Revenue management is a vehicle to help hotels to become aware of the rooms they sell, the rates at which they sell, and the pace at which they sell. It is a way hotels can become pro-active in the selling process, rather than simply posting rates and waiting for them to be sold.

E-mail marketing secrets and lies: Conversion rates

Karen J. Bannan
Jun 29, 2006

E-mail marketing experts often say that it’s not the click-throughs or open statistics that matter so much as your conversion rate, which translates into revenue. Janine Popick, CEO of VerticalResponse, and Morgan Stewart, director of strategic services for ExactTarget, let us in on one secret and one lie about conversion—that Holy Grail of e-mail marketing.

Secret: Because b-to-b products and services can have long sales cycles, you can boost conversion rates by giving customers a taste of what you’re offering. By offering potential customers a limited-use trial, you can help them get comfortable with your product and create good will for your company, Popick said. The key is to make sure you don’t screw it up by betraying that trust, she said.

“A lot of companies ask for a credit card and, in fine print, tell customers they won’t charge them until 30 days after the trial begins. This is one of the simplest ways to lose a customer forever,” Popick said. “When you offer something free, make sure it’s really free.”

Also, make sure that you follow up during the course of that trial so you can provide any help and actually close the sale.

Lie: More is always better. If you have two campaigns, one yielding a 1% conversion rate and the other topping the 2% conversion rate, which one performed better? If you said the one that had a 2% rate, you might be wrong, Stewart said.

“The conversion rate alone is not enough information,” he said. “If the campaign converting 1% has an average order value [AOV] of $300, while the campaign with a 2% conversion rate has a $100 AOV, then the campaign converting at 1% provided a better return than the one with a 2% conversion rate. You really have to maximize the average order value.”

This may mean offering custom-packaged orders that may have a higher price point—and a lower conversion rate—but provide more bang for your customer’s buck, and more revenue for you once a conversion does take place.

Another tip: Don’t misrepresent what conversion really means. Conversion for a free e-mail newsletter may be when someone signs up for it, but for conversion on a solicitation e-mail, the only thing that counts from a statistical value is the actual purchase.

“Some people look at conversion as the percentage of opens,” he said. “Others gauge conversion on people putting stuff in a shopping cart. You have to be very clear and explicit.”

TripAdvisor Promotes Itself as Web Surfers' Destination

Source: ClickZ News

By Pamela Parker | June 30, 2006

User-generated content travel site TripAdvisor hopes to become a hot summertime destination itself as it kicks off a multi-million-dollar integrated ad campaign aimed at generating traffic.

"In the past we've done some search marketing, e-mail, word-of-mouth," said Christine Petersen, senior vice president of marketing for TripAdvisor, a division of Expedia. "As we grow beyond hotel reviews, it's important that we get out there and tell people about that."

Boston-based Connelly Partners worked with TripAvisor on the effort, which began this week.

At stake for the ad campaign is the site's burgeoning advertising business. Until recently, TripAdvisor sold only cost-per-click text advertisements. The firm kicked off graphical advertising in February with a representation deal with the Travel Ad Network (TAN). Since then, TripAdvisor has begun to service travel-specific advertisers with its own sales force, but it still uses TAN for non-endemic advertisers.

The new campaign, spending for which wasn't disclosed, centers around 25 downloadable PDF guidebooks to summer travel locales such as Paris, New York, Sydney and Cabo San Lucas. Both on- and offline ads point to landing pages where the PDFs can be downloaded. The guidebooks are compiled from information posted by site users.

"It's all verbatim from the site," explained Petersen, who added the company chose to create PDFs because they could be changed and updated quickly, unlike a hard copy book.

To download the guides, visitors must enter an e-mail address. Once they do so they're entered into a sweepstakes to win a trip worth up to $5,000. If they "tell a friend" about the guides by entering in their friends' e-mail addresses, they gain entry into a grand prize drawing. TripAdvisor plans to use those addresses for e-mail marketing.

The company is getting the word out about the downloads via radio spots, newspaper ads, and display ads in tourist destinations like San Francisco trolley cars. The company is also placing branded kiosks in airports. Online ads will appear on Fodors.com, Budget Travel Online, Travel Channel and on Tacoda's behavioral network.

TripAdvisor in recent months has launched Inside, a collaborative travel guidebook, and another feature, goLists, user-created lists of things to do at particular destinations. The site saw over 20 million unique visitors in March, according to the company, and it has more than 3.5 million registered members.

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

Top 5 E-Mail Marketing Must-Dos for 2006

Source: www.cmomagazine.com

How to take your programs to the next level in the coming year.

By Scott Olrich

These strategies and tactics will help you maximize your use of the e-mail channel.

1.) E-mail Experiences: The average consumer is exposed to 3,000 ad messages daily, of which they notice 80 and react to 10. How will your e-mails break through the noise? Think about how you can gain entry into the recipient’s inner circle – the 10 to 15 companies whose e-mails they always read. Start by using basic, non-intrusive animations in your e-mails to direct the recipient’s attention to your call-to-action. Include graphic and textual links in your e-mails to complimentary downloads, Web commercials, recorded webinars and push-to-talk technology for richer end user experiences.

2.) E-mail Segmentation: The number-one reason for unsubscribing to e-mail is irrelevant contact. Average e-mail performance metrics will diminish for all subscriber lists over time unless a genuine effort is made to improve customer relevancy. A recent study by JupiterResearch shows that regardless of the attribute used (i.e., purchase behavior, demographics, etc.), any form of segmentation is proven to lift results. Segment your prospect/customer database based on behavior, preferences, demographics, personas, etc. Work toward the ultimate goal of writing e-mail copy to match the tone and style of your matrix of target audience clusters: right message, right person and right time.

3.) E-mail Subscriptions: Scale your existing e-mail program success by accelerating the growth of your master opt-in e-mail database. Start by auditing every customer/prospect touch point. Aggressively leverage Web traffic with quick and easy sign-up forms that require only an e-mail address. Place sign-up forms on high-traffic pages of your website and landing pages (especially to capture search traffic). Also include opt-in messaging deeper in the site on the pages where readers are researching your products and services.

4.) E-mail Testing: Are you making objective (data-driven) or subjective (opinion-based) decisions? Most marketers are relying on their gut to make changes to their e-mail program. The majority are doing no testing whatsoever. Stop gambling with your e-mail program profitability. Test, test, test to get smart on what works and what doesn’t; and remember, you are never completely “done.” It’s also important to refresh your creative on a regular basis. Testing to optimize your e-mail campaigns controls risk and maximizes returns. Testers achieve significantly higher open and click-through rates, and most importantly, higher conversion rates.

5.) E-mail Delivery Audits: An estimated 20 percent of e-mails are blocked or filtered due to firewall and spam filters. These delivery failures are rarely reported by your e-mail delivery system. Work with e-mail deliverability experts or subscribe to a specialized third-party auditing tool to address delivery effectiveness and test for basic rendering. Ask for a comprehensive report that covers content and coding issues (spam triggers), so you can better understand how to get your e-mails delivered to the inbox.

Study: Decline in exact e-mail marketing measurement

Source: HotelMarketing.com

March 21, 2006

As anti-spam technology improves, the ability of companies to measure the results of their e-mail campaigns is deteriorating. At least, that’s one apparent conclusion of a recent study about e-mail marketing released by ExactTarget.

The study reported that open rates seem to have dropped to 35.5 percent in the fourth quarter of last year, from 42.5 percent in the fourth quarter of 2004. But ExactTarget also reported that this apparent decrease might be the result of measurement techniques, which rely on images embedded in the e-mails.

“Image blocking technology is responsible for declining open rates,” asserts the report. “When images are not displayed in HTML e-mail, the subsequent click activity also is negatively impacted.”

ExactTarget also reported that click-through rates were highest on Sundays, while open rates were highest on Fridays. The study’s conclusion: While there is no one best day on which to send e-mail, companies should at least consider sending messages on Fridays and Sundays.

The report was based on data from more than 2.7 billion e-mails sent by more than 4,000 organizations last year.

How to Beat the Competition With Your AdWords Campaigns

Source: www.marketingprofs.com
by Nick Usborne

March 28, 2006

Nothing gets the adrenalin pumping quite like an AdWords campaign that delivers a strong ROI.

Success brings a big grin on your face when you realize you can invest more in the campaign, expand the base of keywords, and make even more money. The more you spend, the more you make.

It's a great moment, while it lasts.

But it doesn't last forever. There will come a point when you hit a plateau. You have tested and optimized different headlines, body text and ad groups, you have adjusted the bid prices, and included just about every related keyword you can imagine.

What Happens?

There a few things that can start to dilute the impact of your campaign.

It may plateau because you have pretty much saturated the niche audience you are appealing to.

You may also have hit the top when it comes to a reasonable bid on your keywords. Should you increase your bid to get yourself into top position every time? Not necessarily. The cost per click in third position may give you a positive ROI. But the extra cents or dollars it would take to get you in the number one spot, while increasing click-throughs, might result in a negative ROI when you do the math on cost per sale.

But perhaps the most troubling cause for finding your campaign going flat is the impact of your competitors.

Many companies with affiliate programs find themselves competing for their top keywords with their affiliates. As a result, more and more affiliate contracts now forbid bidding on the company's own domain, brand, or product names.

However, this won't stop the affiliates of your competitors. If a direct competitor has a strong affiliate program, those affiliates will be competing fiercely with you for the top few ad spots on search results pages.

So what can you do?

How to Get Away from Those Competitors

Once you have a campaign that has plateaued or, worst still, is sliding down the far side of the bell curve, it's time to make some changes.

First, step back from that campaign and stop spending more and more time on achieving ever-diminishing returns.

Instead, start some new campaigns, with new landing pages and some different keywords.

There are a couple of different approaches you can take, either one of which will take you away from that competitive hotspot.

You can go narrow, or you can go wide.

As an example, if your primary AdWords campaign was focused on "cat health," you could go narrow by starting a new campaign based on the name or treatment of a specific cat ailment. It's a narrower niche with a smaller search audience, but would likely give you a better conversion rate.

Using the same example, you could go wide by finding keywords relating to "pet health." It's a broader audience; and though your conversion rate might go down, you could make up for it in numbers.

Whether you go narrow, wide, or both, you'll be working with new landing pages, some new keywords, and new ads. To make the most of these new campaigns, you'll want to go through that process of experimentation...testing and optimizing until you have your headlines, text, and keyword bids just right.

Hopefully, broadening your AdWords base across more audiences and with a larger variety of keywords will get you out of the sights of your most aggressive competitors. For a while at least.

Fighting Fire With Fire

If you have a core campaign (such as your brand name) that has been serving your company well but is now under pressure from aggressive competitors or affiliates, there is an equally aggressive tactic you can try.

Whether Google will allow this practice to continue remains to be seen. But several companies are using it, with considerable success.

Here's the problem you face: While you have continued to increase bids to maintain the top position on your prized words, your competitors continue to poach some of your traffic through capturing positions #2, #3, #4, etc.

And here's a way to capture back some of that traffic and shoulder your competitors out. Open a series of new AdWords accounts (equal to the number of positions you would like to capture). Now build new landing pages for each and host them on different domains.

In each new account write a different ad, and optimize the three landing pages accordingly.

Now for the important part: Purchase the same keywords and, since they are already doing well for your original campaign, you should have a good idea of where to start your bids.

Now run all four campaigns concurrently. Yes, you are competing with yourself. And if your new campaigns are as well optimized as your first, and with a little bidding optimization you can successful capture the top positions on each of your top search results.

One thing to watch out for with this tactic is not to increase the bid prices as a result of your own "competition."

Concluding Thoughts

If you want to beat the competition with AdWords, the best thing you can do is never stand still. When you get a campaign that is working well, don't rest on your laurels.

Keep on testing, narrow and wide. Keep optimizing and measuring. Maybe only one in five, or one in ten, campaigns will work well for you.

But it's worth it.

If you just have one or two ads and landing pages working for you, and you stop searching for more, you're no longer a moving target.

Your competitors will find you, compete with you, and dilute your ROI.

Never stop moving. Never stop trying something new.

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

Google Checkout could click with users

Source: FT.com

July 10, 2006

A small green shopping-trolley icon now appearing next to selected Google ads could be a big boost for the internet search leader’s relationship with advertisers, who provide 99 per cent of its revenues.

Google Checkout, which launched last week, is a fast-track system for consumers to complete transactions on the websites of its customers, according to the Silicon Valley company.

But it also represents a move into online payment services and gives Google the vital end-to-end experience of knowing what happens when users click on its ads.

That in turn could lead to a changing business model. If Google knows how many of these click-throughs lead to purchases, it can charge higher rates based on whether the sales are completed.

Charlene Li, internet analyst with Forrester Research, says this “cost per action” model is one towards which both Google and its customers are gravitating.

“I do believe that they will be moving towards a cost-per-action advertising model; that’s what retailers really want. If I sell $100 worth of goods, what’s that worth based on how well I am converting [the click-throughs to my website into sales]?”

The Internet Knows What You'll Do Next

Source: NYTimes

Published: July 5, 2006

A FEW years back, a technology writer named John Battelle began talking about how the Internet had made it possible to predict the future. When people went to the home page of Google or Yahoo and entered a few words into a search engine, what they were really doing, he realized, was announcing their intentions.

They typed in "Alaskan cruise" because they were thinking about taking one or "baby names" because they were planning on needing one. If somebody were to add up all this information, it would produce a pretty good notion of where the world was headed, of what was about to get hot and what was going out of style.

Mr. Battelle, a founder of Wired magazine and the Industry Standard, wasn't the first person to figure this out. But he did find a way to describe the digital crystal ball better than anyone else had. He called it "the database of intentions."

The collective history of Web searches, he wrote on his blog in late 2003, was "a place holder for the intentions of humankind — a massive database of desires, needs, wants, and likes that can be discovered, subpoenaed, archived, tracked, and exploited to all sorts of ends."

"Such a beast has never before existed in the history of culture, but is almost guaranteed to grow exponentially from this day forward," he wrote. It was a nice idea, but for most of us it was just an abstraction. The search companies did offer glimpses into the data with bare-bones (and sanitized) rankings of the most popular search terms, and Yahoo sold more detailed information to advertisers who wanted to do a better job of selling their products online. But there was no way for most people to dig into the data themselves.

A few weeks ago, Google took a big step toward changing this — toward making the database of intentions visible to the world — by creating a product called Google Trends. It allows you to check the relative popularity of any search term, to look at how it has changed over the last couple years and to see the cities where the term is most popular. And it's totally addictive.

YOU can see, for example, that the volume of Google searches would have done an excellent job predicting this year's "American Idol," with Taylor Hicks (the champion) being searched more often than Katharine McPhee (second place), who in turn was searched more often than Elliot Yamin (third place). Then you can compare Hillary Clinton and Al Gore and discover that she was more popular than he for almost all of the last two years, until he surged past her in April and stayed there.

Thanks to Google Trends, the mayor of Elmhurst, Ill., a Chicago suburb, has had to explain why his city devotes more of its Web searches to "sex" than any other in the United States (because it doesn't have strip clubs or pornography shops, he gamely told The Chicago Sun-Times). On Mr. Battelle's blog, somebody claiming to own an apparel store posted a message saying that it was stocking less Von Dutch clothing and more Ed Hardy because of recent search trends.(A disclosure: The New York Times Company owns a stake in Mr. Battelle's latest Internet company, Federated Media Publishing.)

It's the connection to marketing that turns the database of intentions from a curiosity into a real economic phenomenon. For now, Google Trends is still a blunt tool. It shows only graphs, not actual numbers, and its data is always about a month out of date. The company will never fully pull back the curtain, I'm sure, because the data is a valuable competitive tool that helps Google decide which online ads should appear at the top of your computer screen, among other things. .

But Google does plan to keep adding to Trends, and other companies will probably come up with their own versions as well. Already, more than a million analyses are being done some days on Google Trends, said Marissa Mayer, the vice president for search at Google.

When these tools get good enough, you can see how the business of marketing may start to change. As soon as a company begins an advertising campaign, it will be able to get feedback from an enormous online focus group and then tweak its message accordingly.

I've found Pepsi's recent Super Bowl commercials — the ones centered around P. Diddy — to be nearly devoid of wit, but that just shows you how good my marketing instincts are. As it turns out, the only recent times that Pepsi has been a more popular search term in this country than Coke have been right after a Super Bowl. This year's well-reviewed Burger King paean to Busby Berkeley, on the other hand, barely moved the needle inside the database of intentions.

Hal R. Varian, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, who advises Google, predicts that online metrics like this one have put Madison Avenue on the verge of a quantitative revolution, similar to the one Wall Street went through in the 1970's when it began parsing market data much more finely. "People have hunches, people have prejudices, people have ideas," said Mr. Varian, who also writes for this newspaper about once a month. "Once you have data, you can test them out and make informed decisions going forward."

There are certainly limitations to this kind of analysis. It's most telling for products that are bought, or at least researched, online, a category that does not include Coke, Pepsi or Whoppers. And even with clothing or cars, interest doesn't always translate into sales. But there is no such thing as a perfect yardstick in marketing, and the database of intentions clearly offers something new.

In the 19th century, a government engineer whose work became the seed of I.B.M. designed a punched-card machine that allowed for a mechanically run Census, which eventually told companies who their customers were. The 20th century brought public opinion polls that showed what those customers were thinking. This century's great technology can give companies, and anyone else, a window into what people are actually doing, in real time or even ahead of time.

You might find that a little creepy, but I bet that you'll also check it out sometime.

E-mail: leonhardt@nytimes.com

Web Sites put travelers where the parties are

Source: NYTimes
July 10, 2006

For travelers who just want to party, there are some new online travel agencies that focus on the hottest clubs and concerts.

WantTravel.com, a division of Track Entertainment, a media and lifestyle company in New York, allows travelers to pair flight, hotel and cruise bookings with music, comedy and club events. It says it is aimed at 18-to-35-year-olds. Click on Clubs and Nightlife to link to its sister site, Clubplanet.com, to register for the guest list at clubs.

Stuff, a men’s lifestyle magazine from the publisher of Maxim, and Key2Travel, a luxury concierge service, recently teamed up to create Stuffviptravel.com. The site, which bills itself as a concierge service for “the ultimate bachelor experience” and features photos of scantily clad women, offers concert tickets, V.I.P. entrance to nightclubs and testosterone-pumping vacations like river rafting and off-road trips. The vacation packages offer airline and hotel options. One nifty feature called the Stuff Party Planner makes arranging a bachelor party easy by letting you plan your itinerary and invite friends along.

Monday, July 10, 2006

New Players in Travel Search

Source: SearchEngineWatch

By Brian Smith,
June 27, 2006

Travel search engines, which allow you to book directly with suppliers, have the potential to completely disrupt the status-quo. Here's a look at two new highly disruptive services that offer great advice for travelers.

According to Wikipedia (with a small edit by me), "a market is transparent if much is known by many about: 1) what products and services are available, 2) the price of those products and services, and 3) where those products and services are available. A high degree of transparency can result in disintermediation due to the buyer's increased knowledge of supply pricing." As an economics student in college in the mid-late 90s, the theory of transparency was extremely exciting to me because the internet promised to open everything up, empowering the consumer to make informed decisions.

I'd argue that this vision for the consumer facing internet didn't exactly pan out as planned. And while the travel industry is a lot less opaque than it once was, we're no where near transparency. This is exactly why I'm so bullish on new ideas in online travel booking. At this point, high booking fees are already a thing of the past for many consumers who use the travel search engines (SideStep, Kayak, Mobissimo, FareChase, etc).

Unfortunately, there's still no way to know if you're really getting a good price on your flight. But that could be changing with new offerings from Farecast and FareCompare.

Farecast
http://www.farecast.com

Just as meteorologists try to predict the weather, several PhDs at Farecast are attempting to predict airline prices. Farecast looks at pricing, scheduling, and availability (ok it's actually 115 indicators, but who's counting) to give travelers an idea of when to book to get the best price. For each flight search, Farecast displays whether it believes prices will rise or fall over the next 7 days, how much of a rise or fall in prices is expected, and a confidence level associated with the prediction. Helping to answer the question, should I buy now or wait? Next to this indicator is a fare history chart so consumers can see fluctuations in the lowest price for their search over the last 45-90 days and the average lowest price of a ticket over that period. Farecast has made over 90 billion airfare observations to build relevant (based on real pricing and availability) fare predictions and fare histories. [While this 90 billion number might be hard to get your mind around, the point is that the more data Farecast looks at, the better the company will be at predicting prices.]

Farecast has developed the latest travel search engine (similar to Kayak, Mobissimo, Sidestep and Farechase). With each search, all flight options are displayed on the search results page with links to book direct at airline websites as well as Orbitz. [This direct booking option is one point that sets travel search engines apart from online travel agents.] The display and filtering technology is exactly what you'd expect to see from a 'new' travel search engine as the company employs AJAX and Flash for a Web 2.0-esque experience. Farecast has also created a 'grid display' which shows pricing by time of flight.

Another great feature is the 'Flexible Search' path (it's an alternative choice to 'Quick Search' on the homepage) which is perfect for travelers with more flexible schedules as it allows the user to compare the lowest prices for flights over a 30 day period. You can choose a particular destination or leave it up to Farecast (this is very similar to Kayak's Buzz feature) and just refine by trip length and time of departure/return. Additionally, in the 'graph view', you can quickly compare prices for up to 5 destinations. Finally, there's a 'heat grid' which lets travelers view yesterday's lowest prices by departure date and length of travel, providing further information to figure out the best price and dates for a trip.

Farecast launches today in limited beta, serving only search results departing from Boston and Seattle to all major destinations. Farecast will offer predictions for additional markets throughout the year and plans to have nationwide coverage by year end.

FareCompare
http://www.farecompare.com

As opposed to the normal schedule driven approach, FareCompare is all about analyzing travel from a price driven perspective, allowing the flexible leisure traveler to get a better sense of when to book. FareCompare is not trying to predict prices like Farecast, but rather empowering the consumer to make a more informed buying decision. As the company's white paper on the topic explains, "Most consumers would not go shopping for a car without pulling up Kelley, Edmunds or a few newspapers to get an idea of what price point to expect. The average travel consumer has a sense for what they can afford based on their budget, but most don't have enough experience to have a good "feel" for what is a "good" price for travel between 2 cities."

While not as polished looking as Farecast, FareCompare provides a ton of flight pricing data which made me feel smarter. As international travel prices are based on seasonality, it's especially welcoming to be shown which month and even which week within a month would have the best pricing for a trip to Manila, for instance. FareCompare is making the move to a more consumer friendly model. It's important to note that at this point pricing on the site will not necessarily be available when you click through to book as the site is not looking at seat availability, just recently published pricing data.

FareCompare currently has partnerships with MileMaven and Yaeger Airport (Charleston, WV) to display its flight pricing information. The site has also developed a number of widgets (Google Desktop Plug-in, Yahoo! Widgets, FireFox Extensions, and Apple Widgets) resulting in over 200,000 downloads. Expect many more announcements out of FareCompare as the company makes a big push towards the consumer market.

I really enjoyed talking to both Farecast and FareCompare because they have big ideas about how online travel search should be conducted. The reality, though, is that with Farecast only providing data for Boston and Seattle to select cities, FareCompare not looking at seat availability, and neither company looking at prices for Southwest or Jetblue, both companies miss out on Wikipedia's first requirement of transparency.

So why should you care? Consumers search Expedia then go directly to American Airlines to book. They passionately proselytize the benefits of Mobissimo, but still look at Southwest.com just to make sure they can't get a better deal. They love the Web 2.0 style of Kayak or the SideStep sidebar comparison tool, but still don't really understand the difference between the travel search engines and OTAs. At the same time, they hear wacky stories about an airline in Europe promising to make flights free by charging for ancillary services like in-flight gambling.

It's a clichC), but this chaos in the travel industry creates an amazing opportunity. As Hugh Crean, CEO of Farecast explained, "there's innovation around the theme of demystifying complex transactions. The closer you can get to the best data, the better off you are making a decision." If Farecast brings us a couple steps closer to clairvoyance in the complex travel market, the company could force airlines to adopt simpler pricing models (although that might essentially put Farecast out of business).

The difficulty is going to be in rising above the noise. Orbitz is on every radio station talking about their TLC campaign, Travelocity has filled our dreams (nightmares?) with traveling gnomes, and Kayak is scheduled to launch a TV advertising campaign run by the former branding guru of Vonage. At the same time, SideStep and the rest of the travel search engines are barely a thorn in the side of Expedia.

Predictive technology sounds like a great user benefit and big words like transparency and empowerment are potentially potent themes, but for a start up like Farecast, it still comes down to PR, partnerships, and marketing. I'm sure there are plenty of agency sales representatives reading this article who have already picked up their phones.

Brian A. Smith is a correspondent for Search Engine Watch and publisher of ComparisonEngines.com VerticalSearch.net.

E-mail marketing secrets and lies: Conversion rates

Source: BtoBonline.com

Karen J. Bannan
Jun 29, 2006

E-mail marketing experts often say that it’s not the click-throughs or open statistics that matter so much as your conversion rate, which translates into revenue. Janine Popick, CEO of VerticalResponse, and Morgan Stewart, director of strategic services for ExactTarget, let us in on one secret and one lie about conversion—that Holy Grail of e-mail marketing.

Secret: Because b-to-b products and services can have long sales cycles, you can boost conversion rates by giving customers a taste of what you’re offering. By offering potential customers a limited-use trial, you can help them get comfortable with your product and create good will for your company, Popick said. The key is to make sure you don’t screw it up by betraying that trust, she said.

“A lot of companies ask for a credit card and, in fine print, tell customers they won’t charge them until 30 days after the trial begins. This is one of the simplest ways to lose a customer forever,” Popick said. “When you offer something free, make sure it’s really free.”

Also, make sure that you follow up during the course of that trial so you can provide any help and actually close the sale.

Lie: More is always better. If you have two campaigns, one yielding a 1% conversion rate and the other topping the 2% conversion rate, which one performed better? If you said the one that had a 2% rate, you might be wrong, Stewart said.

“The conversion rate alone is not enough information,” he said. “If the campaign converting 1% has an average order value [AOV] of $300, while the campaign with a 2% conversion rate has a $100 AOV, then the campaign converting at 1% provided a better return than the one with a 2% conversion rate. You really have to maximize the average order value.”

This may mean offering custom-packaged orders that may have a higher price point—and a lower conversion rate—but provide more bang for your customer’s buck, and more revenue for you once a conversion does take place.

Another tip: Don’t misrepresent what conversion really means. Conversion for a free e-mail newsletter may be when someone signs up for it, but for conversion on a solicitation e-mail, the only thing that counts from a statistical value is the actual purchase.

“Some people look at conversion as the percentage of opens,” he said. “Others gauge conversion on people putting stuff in a shopping cart. You have to be very clear and explicit.”

Travel Tip: Booking The Right Hotel Room

Source: ABC News

When planning a trip, most consumers know that shopping around can help save money. But knowing how and where to compare prices is often the key to getting the best deal. That’s especially important when booking a hotel.

Scouring the internet can be time consuming, but more consumers are relying on specialized search engines to help with the legwork.

Adam Meron, Mobissimo VP of Strategy & Marketing: “Mobissimo is a travel search engine and we search over 160 different travel sites directly.”

Adam meron says San Francisco-based Mobissimo is like a Google for travel searches. It finds prices for you, but directs you elsewhere to do the actual booking.

Adam Meron: “We make it convenient, save you time and money,and we get you to the place you want to go as quickly as possible and as cheaply as possible.”

Mobissimo searches hotel sites directly, yet also checks sites like Orbitz. But not even wide-reaching search engines will have the best rates every time.

Top 5 New Years Resolutions For Marketing My Hotel

Source: HotelTechResource

According to industry indices, worldwide electronic hotel revenue from the global-distribution systems and key internet sites continues to climb. Electronic room nights, average daily rates and length of stays are higher month over month in 2005 compared to 2004. There's no indication that the trend will shift and that e-distribution and online bookings will do nothing but climb steadily in 2006.

If you are a hotel marketer who is stuck doing the same things year after year, the time is NOW to make a change - and in a BIG way. It no longer benefits you to spend money on display advertising, co-op ad programs with tour operators or extensive printed pamphlets or brochures that have a limited shelf life. We've entered the age of electronic marketing, and there's no turning back.

The best way to be truly competitive in 2006 is to embrace the Internet as your best marketing tool. To do that, you may need to make the following New Years Resolutions:

Because the Internet should be my best marketing tool, in 2006 I resolve to:

1 Audit all Web site hotel images and ensure that they accurately represent my facility and its features.

Take the time to look at the images of your hotel that are currently on your Web site --- are they up-to-date or are they five or more years old? Then view your hotel from the eyes of your customers. The images of your hotel when seen in a Web environment, rather than a brochure environment, probably are not adequate.

A still shot of a nice vase on the guestroom table with the bedroom blurred in the background won't turn a looker into a booker in today's online marketplace. However, hotels displaying image galleries that are well presented, instead of one to three thumbnail images, have 100 percent more pick up that hotels that don't. In fact, research shows that hotels using image galleries vs. those using thumbnails see an increase in online bookings by up to 70 percent.

So, as you build your preventive maintenance program for 2006 to be sure your furnishings, fixtures and equipment are kept in good condition, begin building a 'preventive marketing' program as well to ensure your Web content and images are fresh and on target.

2 Consider hiring a professional firm to take new images and generate rich media.

Now that you are looking at your Web site in a different light - and from a different perspective - determine whether or not you have consumer-friendly, rich media.

As a traveler, would you book a room at your hotel based on the images you see or would a 360-degree perspective be more inclusive and informative? Have your visual content needs outgrown your personal or property skill set when it comes to Web site design?

Professional, affordable Internet content design firms are available to help you as much--or as little--as needed, from consulting and designing to hosing and managing the content. It doesn't have to cost a lot of money to have a visually effective Web presence. There are ways of taking your existing still images or print brochures and make them come alive online. An e-brochure costs less to produce and can reach the masses in an instant.

The bottom line is that visuals motivate consumers to make a buy decision. If you're going to sell yourself, be sure that you are putting your best foot forward and presenting your hotels with the best marketing tools available.

If you need help, just ask.

3 Add destination photography to my Web site to enrich it.

Making sure your Web site is sticky as long as possible is the key to online marketing success. Consumers are becoming savvier every day and are astutely aware of the range of marketing and depth of detail that shopping online can take them.

For example, just promoting your guestrooms, meeting facilities, recreational activities and food-and-beverage outlets isn't enough. You've got to raise bar in terms of exceeding looker expectations.

Selling your hotel alone (the physical properties) is no longer enough - you've got to sell the experience - and more importantly, the DESTINATION. Showing synergy between the destination and its location shows that you are providing answers to the questions that are in the consumers mind before they even have a chance to ask.

Marketing savvy is vital to brand and property differentiation. Make the difference through destination marketing.

4 Ensure all images include descriptive search-engine optimized captions.

If you're not familiar with Search Engine Optimization, you're probably missing the boat when it comes to online marketing. If your captions are not correct, relevant and basically reflective of the SEO criteria, you can miss an opportunity. It's that simple.

Consumers won't see the images and the content that you have worked so hard to present because they simply aren't reaching your information. Research shows that more consumers