Thursday, August 31, 2006

Clip and Save Holds Its Own Against Point and Click

Erik S. Lesser for The New York Times

Published: August 30, 2006

In an Internet age, it would seem to be a scene from the past. But for Kristine Davis, as for millions of shoppers across the country, it remains a Sunday morning ritual: retrieving the newspaper from the driveway and quickly extracting the coupon inserts.

Skip to next paragraph
Erik S. Lesser for The New York Times

Kristine Davis of Marietta, Ga., says coupon clipping reduces her family’s monthly grocery bill by up to 40 percent.

By shrewdly using coupons, and tracking store sales, Ms. Davis says she can cut the monthly grocery bill by 30 or 40 percent for her family of four in Marietta, Ga., a suburb of Atlanta.

“It makes me feel terrible when I go to the store and don’t have a coupon,” she said. “It’s a way of life.”

It is a way of life, at first glance, that seems especially vulnerable to the relentless advance of the Internet, with its ability to aim at narrow groups of consumers and measure results. An estimated 99 percent of the roughly 300 billion coupons distributed annually in the United States — mainly in Sunday newspapers — end up in the trash, unused and unredeemed.

An Internet assault on the paper-clipping coupon business is indeed under way, and Google has now entered the fray. But while the cool logic of efficiency suggests the traditional paper coupon is in imminent peril, the marketplace tells another story — at least so far.

The coupon business is a case of new technology confronting a deep-seated commercial culture. Market practices, business relationships and consumer expectations developed over decades are not likely to be quickly swept aside.

There are, to be sure, other holdouts against the supposedly inevitable triumph of digital technology and the Internet. At one time or other, the endangered species list of commerce has included books, bricks-and-mortar stores and business travel for face-to-face meetings. But the resilience of the humble paper coupon appears particularly remarkable. Consumer surveys have shown that most American households use coupons, and that the coupon inserts are the second-most-read part of the Sunday newspaper, after the front page.

“Coupons are an ingrained part of the nation’s shopping culture,” said Charles Brown, co-chairman of the Coupon Council, a coupon advocacy group.

The paper coupon, Mr. Brown insists, is a powerful marketing vehicle to reach millions of consumers and build brands and customer loyalty. Proof of the coupon’s worth, he said, is that major companies like Procter & Gamble, S. C. Johnson, General Mills and Kraft continue to rely on traditional coupons, and that the yearly number of coupons distributed keeps rising slightly.

Some marketing experts say that while old habits resist change, the demise of the paper coupon is a sure thing. It is, they say, the marketing equivalent of a blunderbuss, while the Internet offers a laser shot.

“The paper coupon is the single most inefficient marketing tool you could imagine,” said Peter Sealey, a former chief marketing officer at Coca-Cola who is a marketing consultant in Sausalito, Calif. “The traditional paper coupon is going to die. It can’t survive in the Internet world.”

Two weeks ago, Google announced that it would begin offering local discount coupons to people who use its Google Maps service. The search giant is joining companies that have been distributing online coupons for years, like ValPak and CoolSavings, and Silicon Valley start-ups like Coupons Inc. and Zixxo, which are bringing new technology to the business of marketing national or local coupons over the Internet.

The use of online coupons is rising rapidly, by more than 50 percent a year, but they still account for less than 1 percent of the consumer goods coupons distributed, according to the Promotion Marketing Association, a trade group.

Coupon sites like ValPak and CoolSavings, a subsidiary of Q Interactive, offer coupons for local merchants or nationally branded products. But digital coupons are also spread across many Web sites, just as ads are. So those looking for information on baby care might see an online coupon for diapers, while a person looking at a Web site for motorcycle enthusiasts would be more likely to see a coupon for helmets or leather jackets.

That kind of selective marketing, showing consumers advertising and promotions related to their browsing interests, is the potential Internet advantage.

Digital coupons typically must be printed and physically turned in at a store. So, there is still some paper handling. The next stage, according to marketing experts, will come with the spread of digital cellphones with location-tracking and automatic short-range communication technology. Electronic coupons will be delivered to cellphone owners on demand and redeemed by whisking the phone past a cash register scanner, eliminating all paper.

“That’s going to be the nuclear explosion in the coupon business,” said Mr. Sealey, the consultant, who expects that shift to occur in five years or so.

For its part, Google is going after the local coupon market. A person types in a city name or ZIP code and a buying interest, like “pizza,” and Google Maps presents a street map with locations flagged and a list of pizza shops beside the Web map.

Google will give merchants simple Web tools for making digital coupons. It is distributing online coupons, including ones from ValPak, without charge to the local businesses. Google plans to make money mainly by selling more ads to small businesses, linked to search words.

“The economics of distributing coupons digitally is very attractive,” said Shailesh Rao, Google’s director of local search. “We think a big opportunity is there.”

Coupons Inc., a start-up in Mountain View, Calif., is trying to move the coupons for national consumer brands online. Steven R. Boal, the chief executive, recalled that he was struck by the inefficiency of distributing and handling paper coupons when he first looked at the business.

“It was a forehead slapper,” said Mr. Boal, a former vice president for derivatives technology at J. P. Morgan. “This industry is ripe for change.”

In the last few years, the company has built a Web-based system for securely offering printable coupons for many large consumer companies. The number of coupons printed on the Coupons Inc. system has increased more than tenfold this year, Mr. Boal said. The company charges a small transaction fee to the manufacturers when someone prints a digital coupon.

The big transformation of the paper coupon business came in the early 1970’s, when George F. Valassis, a printer and marketing entrepreneur, persuaded consumer product companies to offer coupons that he would aggregate in Sunday newspaper inserts nationwide.

Today, this national coupon industry is estimated at more than $6 billion a year. About half of that is in incentive payments: the amount consumers save when they redeem coupons. The rest goes to all the middlemen involved in distributing, collecting and clearing coupon transactions. Fees are paid at each stage of handling, with retailers typically receiving 8 cents for each coupon they collect and pass along. S. C. Johnson & Son, the maker of Windex, Pledge, Glade and other household products, uses billions of paper coupons annually in its marketing. The nation’s Sunday newspapers can put a coupon in more than 50 million homes, noted Pat Penman, director of marketing services at S. C. Johnson.

“Online coupons are more targeted, but the traditional coupon is a big, pervasive marketing technique,” Mr. Penman said.

And while coupon clippers, Ms. Penman added, are looking for savings, they are also browsing for new products. So last month when the company introduced its Glade PlugIns Scented Oil Light Show, an air freshener in a light that changes color, it started an aggressive coupon campaign in Sunday newspapers.

“The Internet is having a big impact in how we market,” Ms. Penman observed. “But it’s not a light switch. It’s a transition.”

Coupon fanatics, it seems, will find plenty in their Sunday papers for years to come. But even for those coupons, the Internet can be a tool. Ms. Davis, in the Atlanta suburbs, frequents Web sites like www.couponmom.com, run by Stephanie Nelson, whose “virtual coupon organizer” is a state-by-state Web database of coupon offers in newspaper circulars.

Consumer product companies issue coupons to encourage people to sample new products, to make impulse purchases and to foster brand loyalty — not to enable the coupon cognoscenti to routinely save 30 or 40 percent on the monthly grocery bills.

So the two sides — producer and consumer — use different terms to describe certain shopping tactics. Sometimes, for example, a product will go on sale weeks after a coupon is published, but shortly before the coupon expires. The resulting savings can be huge — the item can be almost free — and that is not what the product maker had in mind with promotional campaigns that just barely overlap. To companies, this tactic is “stacking,” suggesting a gaming of the system. To shoppers, it is a “double play,” a cleverly timed move.

“That’s really exciting,” Ms. Davis said.


Sunday, August 27, 2006

Marriott expands online tools to meeting planners

Marriott International is expanding its At Your Service pre-arrival planning to meetings and events worldwide.

The complimentary service is part of Marriott’s Spirit to Serve Our Guests initiative and will be available at nearly 2,500 hotels worldwide, including Marriott Hotels & Resorts, JW Marriott Hotels & Resorts, Renaissance Hotels & Resorts, Courtyard, SpringHill Suites, Fairfield Inn, Residence Inn, TownePlace Suites and Marriott Conference Centers.

As a part of the pre-arrival planning for groups, Marriott will make the optional service available to meeting planners so attendees can receive details of their stay five days prior to arrival. Resort meeting attendees will receive an e-mail 14 days in advance. The pre-arrival e-mail will include a reservation confirmation, information about property-specific amenities, the weather forecast, maps, directions and transportation from the airport and local area information.

“We have received great feedback from customers on our pre-arrival planning service, which is already available to business and leisure travelers,” said Mike Beardsley, senior vice president, national group and field sales, Marriott International, Inc. “Now meeting planners can choose to extend this popular service to their attendees as an added value of convenience and information.”

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Online Retailers Continue to Ring Up Impressive Sales

AUGUST 22, 2006

Web sales growth remains strong as consumers spend more across a wider range of online product categories.

By Jeffrey Grau - Senior Analyst


On August 17, the Census Bureau of the US Department of Commerce (DoC) released its second-quarter 2006 estimates of retail e-commerce sales. According to the new data, in the first half of 2006, US Web retailers sold $49.3 billion worth of products (excluding online travel and event tickets), representing a 24.2% rise over online sales in the same period last year. Neither higher energy prices nor shrinking personal savings accounts are curbing consumer enthusiasm for online shopping. Particularly impressive is the fact that the sales gains reported for the first half of 2006 come on top of strong online sales last year.

A look at some of the largest Web retailers shows that not all of them are reaping rewards. Amazon, the world's largest online retailer with 2005 sales of $8.5 billion, had sales growth of 20.9% in the first half of 2006 compared to last year, and PC Connections (ranked 33rd in the Internet Retailer Top 500 Guide) enjoyed a 50.5% sales increase over the same period. However, Overstock (ranked 18th by Internet Retailer) grew by only 7.4%.

Separately, comScore's analysis reveals that the three online retail categories with the largest increase in sales in the first half of 2006 compared to a year ago were office supplies (54%), computer software excluding PC games (39%) and sport and fitness gear (38%).

A comparison of growth rates of total retail and online retail sales shows that the Internet channel is still growing much faster. While online sales grew by 24% year over year in the first half of 2006, total retail sales increased by only 7.4% in the same period. The jump in first half, year-on-year retail sales growth from 6.7% in 2005 to 7.4% in 2006 came largely from gas station sales (something that is not purchased online). Remove these sales and retail sales growth in the first half of 2006 dropped from 7.4% to 6.2%.

Some of the same highflying categories on the Internet are also doing well in stores. Sporting goods stores, for example, were one of the top growth categories, enjoying 13.3% growth. But some store categories are less fortunate. Retail sales at computer and software stores (close, but not exactly equivalent to comScore's computer software category) fell by 3.5%, for example. Computer hardware and software is a popular online purchase and the poor store sales are partially due to consumers switching more of their purchases online.

The first half of the year generally accounts for around 45% of annual online sales, so the second half of the year, and especially the holiday shopping season (November and December), isvery important for all retailers. Based on the new DoC numbers, eMarketer has revised its 2006 retail e-commerce forecast slightly upward, even though slower growth is expected in the second half of the year. Online sales will reach $108.5 billion in 2006, a 23.2% gain over 2005. Overall, the future of Web retailing looks bright as consumers rely increasingly on the Internet to meet their shopping needs.

Sending Signals to Search Engines


Advice & Opinions. By & for Marketers

By Mike Grehan | August 21, 2006

This week, I'm in New York mentally downloading all the data I picked up at Search Engine Strategies (SES) San Jose. And if there's one thing I picked up loud and clear, it was the word "signal."

For years, we've been talking about links using terms such as "hubs and authorities," "in degree," and "connectivity data." But these days, you'll hear the search engine reps talk about links as a signal. During a link-building Q-and-A session, I must have heard the word "signal" about 100 times from the various panel members.

There was also a sense of déjà vu that I got when search engine reps talked about links. I remember conferences three or four years ago when the they were happy to downplay the importance of meta tags and on-page factors compared to the power of linkage data.

Now it appears they are downplaying the power of linkage data as just another (albeit important) signal among many others.

What's a "Signal"?

In Chris Anderson's must-read book, "The Long Tail," there's a section called "Is the long tail full of crap?" Here, he refers to the field of information theory and how it was built around the problem of pulling coherent signals from random electrical noise. This occurred first in radio broadcasts, then in any sort of electrical transmission.

The notion of a signal-to-noise ratio is now broadly used to refer to any instance where clearing away distraction is a challenge. In the long tail, noise is a huge problem. And search certainly has a very long tail. This is why it needs filters.

It's also interesting how Anderson in that same section says Google taps into "the wisdom of the crowd itself and turns a mass of incoherence into the closest thing to an oracle the world has ever seen."

Let's be clear. At this time, links may just be another signal to a search engine. But currently, I find them to be a pretty loud, potent signal. Links send a number of important signals to a search engine. First, the number and quality of incoming links can signal your standing in the community, or your authoritativeness.

Link anchor text can often tell a search engine more of what a target page is about than the page itself. Of course, this depends on the nature and class of the end-user query.

A lot of research has been done on the relationship between anchor text and query terms. When anchor text terms match a query, the target document will usually be very relevant to the query terms. (I usually find there's a relationship between anchor text and both query and title tag terms. The closer they're related, the better a document seems to rank for certain query classes.)

Although links provide excellent signals, if linkage data remained permanently static in a search engine database they would regularly return incorrect results for certain queries. For instance, when a new president is elected, all the information on the White House Web site is updated to reflect this. But there's still a whole lot of old president linkage data surrounding the site.

So another signal that a link needs to send to a search engine is related to temporal analysis, that is, how old or new a link is. Some pages become very popular, so they attract many links. Yet popularity is often dictated by trends and fashions that change over time.

This is a particular area I'm keen to discover more about. Generally speaking, you can perform a sort of temporal analysis of Web pages by simply monitoring the "last modified" HTTP header field. But it's a lot more difficult to discover how relevant a link is to a specific topic a year after it was placed on a page.

I feel certain, though, that search engines can glean a lot more temporal analysis related to linkage data when it's combined with the other signals they talk about, such as burstiness, end-user behavior data, social search, and personalization.

Even though search engines may have new signals to monitor, I still believe link-building is the most crucial area in SEO (define), particularly in highly competitive fields. Don't deemphasise its importance for a little while yet.

Further Reading

On the subject of links and anchor text, I recommend a great tutorial from Dr. Edel Garcia, debunking many of the myths about latent semantic indexing (LSI).

And I've no idea how I missed this article from earlier this year, which I stumbled across recently. It's a fascinating interview between my friend and former ClickZ columnist Fredrick Marckini and Stephen Arnold, one of the big brains in search, examining Google from a technical perspective.

Mike Grehan has executive experience with the industry's leading SEM firms and is recognized as one of the foremost SEM experts. He is the author of multiple books and white papers on the topic, and his best-selling second edition of "Search Engine Marketing: The essential best practice guide" received more plaudits from the industry's leading players than any other book on the subject. In 2004, Mike was voted one of the U.K.'s top 100 influential people in Internet marketing for the previous decade in a poll of online marketer E-consultancy's 22,000 U.K. members. Mike is a sought-after SEM speaker, and his newsletter has attracted over 17,000 subscribers. Mike played a key role as founding member and promoter of the global Search Marketing Association (SMA) movement and sits on the board of SMA-UK.


Bypass SEM with Smart Website Strategy

August 21, 2006

Sedo's chief strategy officer outlines how to cut SEM costs by buying the right website domain names.

Marketers assume that "Googling" for information is an automatic response the instant a web surfer opens a browser. And for many internet users, the theory is true. But for a number of reasons, and with increasing regularity, many people bypass search engines altogether in favor of a technique called direct navigation. Simply put, direct navigation is when a user directly types a web address into a browser.

The concept of direct navigation is as old as the web-- internet users frequently key in their favorite sites stored in their personal memory. To put this into context, WebSideStory, Inc.'s StatMarket division notes that more than two-thirds of daily global internet users arrive at a website via direct navigation, compared with just 14 percent of traffic from search engines.

But the phenomenon of direct navigation to generically named sites with an "intent to search" is a relatively new concept that shifts how marketers must think about their own website traffic and how consumers are finding information about the things that interest them.

Marketers are turning to direct navigation programs to complement their search campaigns for a number of reasons, including the emergence of programs like AdSense and other technologies which can populate unused web domains with information to create mini-portals. Online consumers are turning to these "parked" websites -- pages populated mostly by relevant keyword ads -- because they can sometimes produce better, quicker results that avoid the manipulated listings that increasingly clog search engine results for highly commercial keyword terms.

In fact, it is estimated by several organizations that traffic to parked pages drives about 10 percent of the pay-per-click (PPC) ad market. Even more interesting, WebSideStory found that direct navigation had a 4.23 percent conversion-to-sale rate, while search engine clicks on average lead to a 2.3 percent conversion-to-sales rate.

With that much quality traffic heading to these generic sites, organizations are now considering how to capture that traffic directly. Consider that a parked page like Wifi.com, for example, captures 15,000 monthly targeted visitors. Purchasing this volume of traffic through a pay-per-click search engine would cost nearly $10,000 per month (based upon the current top Yahoo! bid price of $0.66 for the term Wifi). Yet the domain name is currently listed for sale at domain marketplace Sedo.com with an asking price of $350,000-- an investment that would pay for itself in under three years, even faster if current trends of rising traffic and click prices continue. So instead of writing a hefty check to Google or Yahoo every month, why not purchase the domain and secure this traffic for life?

Marketers can use generic targeted domain names as a traffic source in three primary ways:

  1. Simply re-direct the domain to your main site. Examples: Books.com (Barnes&Noble), PC.com (Intel), Loans.com (Bank of America), Website.com (DotEasy), RentalCar.com (Enterprise).
  2. Use the domain as a targeted vertical portal to drive traffic to your main site. This method requires more effort but is more likely to lead to increasing traffic over time, will likely generate higher conversion rates, and can strengthen your position as a leader in a given market category. Examples: Baby.com (Johnson & Johnson), Meningitis.com (Chiron Vaccines).
  3. Re-brand your entire operation on the new generic domain. Obviously this is the most extreme example, but there are many advantages to branding your company on a premium generic domain: You instantly gain credibility as a leader in your space, and generally garner higher conversion-to-sale ratios with less expenditure on marketing and brand-building. Examples: DealTime and Epinions become Shopping.com; Ice.com becomes Diamond.com.

Finding the right domains for direct navigation
There are a number of things to consider when determining which domain names to acquire in your direct navigation initiatives. Much of it gets back to marketing basics-- who is your audience and how can you reach them?

  1. What are your customers looking for that you have to offer? Don't just think of which "category" you position yourself in, but how do your customers describe you/your product? Acquiring the .com version of your most productive SEM keyword terms is usually a good place to start.
  2. Keep it simple. One-word domains or very short phrases offer the greatest value and highest traffic.
  3. Choose the right extension. Generally .com domains are the best choice as they receive a magnitude more type-in traffic than other extensions. However, if you're interested in traffic from a particular country, you may be better off acquiring the country-code version of the domain name-- for example, .co.uk for traffic from the United Kingdom.
  4. Keep it generic. Registering a variation of your competitor's site or products rather than generic descriptive terms could put you in conflict with trademark law.
  5. Research traffic volume before buying. Some domain sellers or domain marketplaces will provide guidance as to how many visitors the domain currently receives. Otherwise, a handy rule of thumb is that direct navigation traffic volume is generally correlated to search query volume for that keyword, which you can research using Yahoo's Keyword Selector Tool.

Once you identify the domains you'd like, there are a variety of ways to acquire them. If you're lucky and the domains are still available, you just need to choose a domain registrar and pay an annual registration fee of around $10 to $35. If the domains are already taken -- and most good traffic domains are -- you still have options: You can try researching the domain owner and making an unsolicited offer, or browse the listings at a domain name marketplace where you'll find thousands of high traffic domain names that are definitely for sale. If all of that sounds like a bit too much work, you can always hire a domain broker to do all of the legwork, including tracking down owners, negotiating a price and assisting with the ownership transfer.

Direct navigation as a marketing investment
As a marketer, investing in direct navigation generally pays for itself within a year or two, dependent of course on the quality of the domain and how well you can convert the traffic into sales. However, instead of being an expense, as with purchasing clicks from a search engine, acquiring a domain (or portfolio of domains) for direct navigation purposes becomes an asset that retains its value (possibly even increasing in value) and can even be re-sold again in the future should your marketing objectives change. Domain name prices have risen dramatically over the past years as the supply of quality available names becomes ever smaller, and with more and more businesses coming online every day, that picture is unlikely to change anytime soon.

Only a few very savvy firms have already discovered that in this click-hungry era where many companies blow tens of thousands of dollars each month on PPC advertising, that purchasing targeted generic domain names delivers the same type of high quality targeted visitors at a much, much lower cost.

Matt Bentley is chief strategy officer at Sedo. Read full bio.

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

Advertising Placements by Industry and Top Sponsored Links, July 2006

August 18, 2006

The industry breakdown of ad placements and unit types and top 25 companies placing sponsored links. The data are provided by Nielsen//NetRatings.

Advertising Breakdown by Industry, June and July 2006
IndustryTotal Impressions July 2006
(M)
Total Impressions June 2006
(M)
Change From Previous Month (%)
Automotive3,624.14,406.6-17.76
Business to business5,361.65,108.64.95
Consumer goods6,199.07,396.2-16.19
Entertainment5,229.54,100.127.55
Financial services51,737.850,226.23.01
Hardware and electronics5,834.27,754.5-24.76
Health4,460.94,045.110.28
Public services22,125.214,027.057.73
Retail goods and services44,554.244,021.31.21
Software3,349.33,066.79.22
Telecommunications22,442.136,206.7-38.02
Travel9,093.98,583.75.94
Web media47,970.049,338.3-2.77
Source: Nielsen//NetRatings, 2006

Advertising Breakdown by Ad Unit Types, July 2006
IndustryFlash (Generic) (M)Rich Media (M)Sponsored Link (M)Standard Image (M)Standard Image/Text Link (M)
Automotive1,989.4179.0356.4954.4144.9
Business to business497.118.92,613.31,273.4958.9
Consumer goods2,275.4350.41,598.81,726.6247.8
Entertainment2,649.0496.2355.11,250.0479.3
Financial services7,130.0292.94,063.211,478.628,773.2
Hardware and electronics2,045.0198.9378.71,869.01,342.6
Health1,889.1123.5948.01,396.2104.0
Public services1,365.044.51,364.84,774.814,576.1
Retail goods and services9,593.0278.813,411.313,238.98,032.3
Software760.8518.2773.01,129.0168.4
Telecommunications9,454.678.81,025.79,175.92,707.2
Travel3,289.486.93,087.72,063.6566.3
Web media11,029.7100.214,817.812,912.09,110.3
Source: Nielsen//NetRatings, 2006

Top 25 Companies by Number of Sponsored Link Impressions, June and July 2006
CompanySponsored Link Impressions, - July 2006 (M)Sponsored Link Impressions,- June 2006 (M)Change From Previous Month (%)
eBay, Inc.3,102.03,085.20.54
NexTag.com786.4826.6-4.86
Target Corporation536.5363.547.60
InterActiveCorp477.8396.020.66
Yahoo Inc.435.0358.021.51
Orbitz406.9366.111.15
Vonage Holdings Corp.403.2442.6-8.90
Amazon.com, Inc.370.0349.55.89
Time Warner Inc.342.4402.7-14.96
GUS Plc.319.8428.5-25.38
BizRate.com306.7312.4-1.82
Scottrade, Inc.301.5243.124.03
Cendant Corporation300.1296.81.14
NextStudent294.3433.3-32.07
DADAmobile Inc.290.4186.256.00
Shopzilla International273.5245.711.33
Shop.com271.9277.2-1.94
Interchange Corporation229.4197.716.03
TheUseful220.9166.033.11
Pickamortgage191.5118.461.72
Overstock.com185.8194.4-4.45
Best-price.com179.8161.511.31
Toseeka.com179.1303.8-41.04
SideStep170.8145.017.77
Dell Computer Corporation161.9152.76.02
Source: Nielsen//NetRatings, 2006

Top 25 Companies by Top Three Search Terms, July 2006
CompanySearch Term 1Search Term 2Search Term 3
eBay, Inc.myspacegmailhotmail
NexTag.comdellipodcanon+bubble+jet+
s300+printer
Target Corporationhigh+school
+musical
dog+backgroundsfurniture
InterActiveCorphotelstravelairline+tickets
Yahoo Inc.heelysfree+downloadsfedex
Orbitzorbitzdelta+airlinesunited+airlines
Vonage Holdings Corp.verizon+dslvonagedsl+providers
Amazon.com, Inc.tom+zartnarnia+movie+reviewipod
Time Warner Inc.mapquestmiss+universeaim+express
GUS Plc.free+credit+reportpolka+dot+pursealfred+hitchcock+
dvd+rebecca
BizRate.comairlinessidekick+3paintball+guns
Scottrade, Inc.ebayscottrade"g.g."
Cendant Corporationcar+rentalscar+rentalairline+tickets
NextStudentstudent+loansscholarshiptexas+scholarships
DADAmobile Inc.free+chatwww.wwe-club.comfree+ringtones
Shopzilla Internationalasolo+xenon
+hiking+shoes
john+cenaginger+cookies
Shop.comwweharry+pottermaps
Interchange Corporationwww.edge+x.comunemploymentteen+jobs
TheUsefulsidekick+3free+makeup+samplesdiscover+card
Pickamortgagegovernment+programs
+with+lower+mortgage
+refinancing+rates
+for+fixed+income
+disabled+couples
refinance+companieshome+equity+loans
Overstock.compokemondmvwwe
Best-price.compolka+dot+purseredemption+cardsschleich
Toseeka.comgrand canyonupsfafsa
SideStephotelscatalina+islandhattiesburg,ms
Dell Computer Corporationdellwireless+internetcheap+laptops
Source: Nielsen//NetRatings, 2006

View: Advertising Placements by Industry and Top Sponsored Links, June 2006

Monday, August 21, 2006

Introduction to Social Media Optimization

Written by Cameron Olthuis on August 15, 2006 | 12 comments

Social Media Optimization (SMO) is a new term that was recently coined by Rohit Bhargava and has since been taking on life of its own. In his introduction to SMO, Rohit draws similar comparisons to SEO. SMO tactics can drive huge amounts of people to a website and can also determine whether a startup, website or idea will make it or not. It involves driving traffic to a website through new channels because search engines aren't the only sites that drive big traffic anymore. While it's not taking over SEO yet, it has the potential to someday soon.

First of all "social media" is a buzzword that has been thrown around a lot lately. But what exactly does it really mean? Wikipedia describes social media as...

the online tools and platforms that people use to share opinions, insights, experiences, and perspectives with each other. Social media can take many different forms, including text, images, audio, and video. Popular social mediums include blogs, message boards, podcasts, wikis, and vlogs.

Also, social media can be considered anything that can help build a community to rally around. Companies/websites such as Digg, Delicious, Facebook, and Revver all fit the bill. These are all websites that can now be used as places to put out your marketing message. Spreading messages through blog posts and blog search engines also fits the bill. It is all about making something easy to spread, which, by the way, used to be called word-of-mouth. Buyer beware though, you can't force SMO. This is pull marketing; it is not "push your message onto someone marketing".

With SEO the goals are clearly defined, you're trying to make a website visible in the search engines. Is SMO really as simple to define as making your site visible in the social media? Does that entail anyway possible and include buying banner ads on MySpace?

Rohit defines the goals as...

The concept behind SMO is simple: implement changes to optimize a site so that it is more easily linked to, more highly visible in social media searches on custom search engines (such as Technorati), and more frequently included in relevant posts on blogs, podcasts and vlogs.

... and then he lays out 5 rules for SMO...

  1. Increase Your Linkability
  2. Make Tagging and Bookmarking easy
  3. Reward Inbound Links
  4. Help Your Content Travel
  5. Encourage the Mashup

...Jeremiah Owyang gives us a couple more rules...

  1. Be a User Resource, Even if it Doesn't Help You
  2. Reward Helpful and Valuable Users

In way it sounds a whole lot like Marketing 2.0. It is pretty much includes all the new marketing techniques that are becoming popular rolled into one, techniques such as; Linkbaiting, Usability Design, Buzz Marketing, Community Building, and anything that can be considered "pull marketing".

Here's a few more possible rules...

8. Participate - Join the conversation. Social Media is a two way street, lets not forget that. By conversing with the community you are creating awareness and prolonging your buzz. You are keeping it going and this often results in a snowball effect. Participating helps your message spread further and faster.

9. Know how to target your audience - If you don't even know your target audience you are in trouble. I would love to have everyone using my product too, but you need to be realistic. There is always going to be a certain audience you can appeal to and others that you can't. So know your appeal and who it is appealing to.

10. Create content - There are certain kinds of content that just naturally spread socially. It does not matter what industry you are in and what boring products you sell, there is always some kind of content that can be created that will work. Whether it is creating widgets, making people laugh, or writing a whitepaper, it can be done. Know what type of content can work for you and create it.

11. Be real - The community does not reward fakers.

While social media optimization is becoming very important you can't forget about good old SEO either. Google and Yahoo still drive mass amounts of traffic and you ca not ignore them. It is all about leveraging new mediums and riding these waves. Even though you might be getting dirt on the white glove you still have to take advantage of these powerful channels.

I'm hoping these articles will encourage discussion and new rules that develop from others. As Rohit says...

There are many other "rules" and techniques that we are starting to uncover as this idea gets more sophisticated. In the meantime we are always on the lookout for new ideas in Social Media Optimization to encourage even better thinking.

Update (8/17/2006): Loren Baker from Search Engine Journal chimes in with rules 12 and 13. Lee Odden from the Online Marketing Blog gives us rules 14, 15, and 16.


Social Networks gaining on Top Portals

compete.com


Membership at social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpace is exploding. Everyone is doing it. Well… a lot of people are. In June, 2 out of every 3 people online visited a social networking site.

Since January 2004, the number of people visiting or taking part in one of the top online social networks has grown by over 109% (primarily driven by MySpace). Most of this growth has come about in the past 12 months alone! Social networking sites are now close to eclipsing traffic to the giants - Google and Yahoo.

For a clearer picture, take a look at the charts below:

Bottom-line:

More and more people are and will discover online social networking over time, much like we discovered email back in the 90’s. Explosive usage growth of the social networking sites mentioned in this post is a clear indicator that this is already happening. Will social network usage surpass that of Yahoo and Google? If I were a betting man, I would put my money on it.

Note: All metrics mentioned in this post represent U.S. traffic

Saturday, August 19, 2006

Metropark Hotel Kowloon


Metropark Hotel Kowloon (Hong Kong) is situated at the heart of Kowloon in Hong Kong. This HK hotel provides easy access to Hong Kong's major shopping areas. Airport shuttle and free hotel shuttle bus service are provided by this Hong Kong hotel. The hotel is near subway and railway stations within walking distance of around 10 minutes. Metropark Hotel Kowloon, Hong Kong is facilitated with hotel (Chinese & Western) restaurants, a bar, a rooftop swimming pool and health club for hotel visitors' enjoyment. Free broadband Internet access with unlimited usage is available in all hotel rooms.

香港九龍維景酒店位處香港九龍半島心臟地帶,香港主要商業、購物中心近在咫尺。這所香港酒店提供收費機場巴士及免費酒店穿梭巴士,接載旅客往返酒店與香港 國際機場、旺角及尖沙咀之間;而前往地下鐵及火車站亦只需步行約十分鐘。香港九龍維景酒店為酒店旅客提供全面的酒店服務,包括:中西餐廳、酒吧、露天游泳 池及健身室。 酒店內所有客房均設寬頻互聯網接口,供酒店住客免費無限使用。

Hotel website: www.metroparkhotelkowloon.com

Google search ads find momentum

MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. — Click. That's the sound of found money.
The Google booth at the Search Engine Strategies conference in San Jose, Calif. Attendees discussed the booming "search economy."


Another check is being electronically distributed by Google (GOOG) to a website owner or blogger, in return for hosting Google ads. The monthly stipends can range from hundreds of dollars to many thousands.

Folks who make their living from Internet search converged last week on Silicon Valley to attend the Search Engine Strategies conference and celebrate the rollicking "search economy" at a party at Google headquarters with massive food and karaoke contests.

The red-hot growth of online social networks such as MySpace and video clip sites — YouTube shows 100 million videos daily — is playing a major part in fueling the growth. Both sites run ads from Google.

The search-advertising market, with its little text ads published near search listings, is expected to grow to $26 billion in 2010 from $17.4 billion this year, says market tracker Forrester Research. Google accounts for the biggest chunk. The company reported $6.1 billion in revenue last year and nearly $5 billion in the first two quarters this year.

No wonder people are celebrating.

"I put up a website, add the Google ads and wait for the money to start flying in," says Marc Ostrofsky, president of iREIT.com, a major purchaser of website domains. The company owns 400,000 sites, including MutualFunds.com and Bands.com. Fueled by Google ads, the sites generate more than $10 million a year, he says.

Hitting the jackpot

Sponsors love search ads because they pay only if someone clicks on one. Folks like Ostrofsky who put the ads on their sites also get paid for the clicks. Google's AdSense network places ads all over the Web, targeting readers of a specific website or blog.

"The whole advent of blogging and social networks is that people can get their thoughts out there, and be paid for it," says Google Vice President Sheryl Sandberg. "We started off crawling the world's information for the Google index. Now, we fund the creation of that information."

David Miles Jr. has experienced lottery-style winnings by pairing his interest in MySpace with Google.

Miles, 20, and friend Kato Leonard, 21, created Freeweblayouts.net in 2005 to help MySpace members add graphic backgrounds to personal pages.

They added AdSense ads to the site to try to bring in a few bucks. From a first check of $60, Miles says, they now average $100,000 a month from Google. Just for offering graphics that he and Leonard make in Photoshop (ADBE).

"The more visitors we get, the more money Google sends us," says Miles. "And traffic is increasing all the time."

Kim Malone, Google's director of online sales and operations, calls their success "just astounding."

Google mostly has this corner of the market to itself. Yahoo (YHOO) started a similar service this year as a test, and small players such as Kanoodle and Miva Marketplace are out there, "but Google totally dominates," says Chris Winfield, president of 10e20, a search marketing firm.

Last week, old media titans Viacom (VIA) and 20th Century Fox (NWS) announced advertising alliances with Google. The reason: AdSense.

Google's $900 million deal with Fox's MySpace will place text ads on the growing online social network, now the sixth-most-visited website, according to measurement firm ComScore Media Metrix. The alliance with Viacom's MTV Networks goes a step further. It uses the AdSense model to place video ads on MTV and Nickelodeon clips that will appear on blogs and websites.

The Google-MTV alliance is positioned as a trial that will begin later this year. "If it works," says Google CEO Eric Schmidt, "it will offer a model for how advertising-supported video and multimedia is presented on the Web."

The explosion of "user-generated" content — sites such as MySpace where people bare their souls and invite friends to share their lives online with pictures, music and video clips — has had a profound impact on the AdSense network, says Malone.

She says the combination of high-trafficked community sites such as MySpace, YouTube, Hi5.com and BlackPlanet plus Google's AdSense has created a "whole new business model."

"They get such tremendous traffic and need ads," Malone says. "We provide that, and we both profit."

Content questioned

Not everyone is a fan of some of the get-rich-quick sites. Many are littered with ads and short on meaningful content — a trend known as "search spam."

"AdSense, in my opinion, is the worst thing to happen to the Internet," says John Scott, who runs the V7n.com online forum for search marketers. "Google is ... in essence, paying people to inundate the Web with literally billions of worthless pages."

Whatever its editorial worth, the AdSense business model clearly works for what blogger Jennifer Slegg describes as "hundreds of thousands" of website and blog publishers.

Slegg, who runs the JenSense AdSense tips blog, says the monthly AdSense bounty ranges from $100 to tens of thousands of dollars.

"The average is more like a few thousand a month," she says. "The ones who do really, really well, however, really work for it. It's not a windfall; they put in the hours."

Posted 8/13/2006 9:41 PM ET

Friday, August 18, 2006

The alliance against Google

Aug 10th 2006 | SAN FRANCISCO
From The Economist print edition
What today's internet firms can learn from 19th-century history

What today's internet firms can learn from 19th-century history


PRINCE KLEMENS VON METTERNICH, foreign minister of the Austrian Empire during the Napoleonic era and its aftermath, would have no trouble recognising Google. To him, the world's most popular web-search engine would closely resemble the Napoleonic France that in his youth humiliated Austria and Europe's other powers. Its rivals—Yahoo!, the largest of the traditional web gateways, eBay, the biggest online auction and trading site, and Microsoft, a software empire that owns MSN, a struggling web portal—would look a lot like Russia, Prussia, and Austria. Metternich responded by forging an alliance among those three monarchies to create a “balance of power” against France. Google's enemies, he might say, ought now to do the same thing.

Google announced two new conquests on August 7th. It struck a deal with Viacom, an “old” media firm, under which it will syndicate video clips from Viacom brands such as MTV and Nickelodeon to other websites, and integrate advertisements into them. This makes Google the clear leader in the fledgling but promising market for web-video advertising. It also announced a deal with News Corporation, another media giant, under which it will provide all the search and text-advertising technology on News Corporation's websites, including MySpace, an enormously popular social-networking site.

These are hard blows for Yahoo! and MSN, which had also been negotiating with News Corporation. Both firms have been losing market share in web search to Google over the past year—Google now has half the market. They have also fallen further behind in their advertising technologies and networks, so that both make less money than Google does from the same number of searches. Safa Rashtchy, an analyst at Piper Jaffray, a securities firm, estimates that for every advertising dollar that Google makes on a search query, Yahoo! makes only 60-70 cents. Last month Yahoo! said that a new advertising algorithm that it had designed to close the gap in profitability will be delayed, and its share price fell by 22%, its biggest-ever one-day drop.

MSN is further behind Google than Yahoo! in search, and its parent, Microsoft, faces an even more fundamental threat from the expansionist new power. Many of Google's new ventures beyond web search enable users to do things free of charge through their web browsers that they now do using Microsoft software on their personal computers. Google offers a rudimentary but free online word processor and spreadsheet, for instance.

The smaller eBay, on the other hand, might in one sense claim Google as an ally. Google's search results send a lot of traffic to eBay's auction site, and eBay is one of the biggest advertisers on Google's network. But the relationship is imbalanced. An influential recent study from Berkeley's Haas School of Business estimated that about 12% of eBay's revenues come indirectly from Google, whereas Google gets only 3% of its revenues from eBay. Worst of all for eBay, Google is starting to undercut its core business. Sellers are setting up their own websites and buying text advertisements from Google, and buyers are using its search rather than eBay to connect with sellers directly. As a result, “eBay would be wise to strike a deep partnership with Yahoo! or Microsoft in order to regain a balance of power in the industry,” said the study's authors, Julien Decot and Steve Lee, sounding like diplomats at the Congress of Vienna in 1814.

The alliances are already being struck. Last year Yahoo! and Microsoft announced that they would connect their instant-messaging systems—both of which are much more popular than Google's alternative—and in July they said that they would extend this co-operation to “voice chat” (formerly known as “calling”). In May, Yahoo! and eBay struck an alliance in which eBay will use technology from Yahoo! to place advertisements on its auction site. On the other side of the bargain, Yahoo! will use PayPal, eBay's online payment mechanism, for transactions from Yahoo!'s pages. (Google recently launched a rival payment system of its own.)

The strongest alliance, of course, would be a merger or takeover. MSN and Yahoo! both wanted to buy some or all of AOL, a big, troubled internet-access company owned by Time Warner, a media conglomerate. But Google pre-empted its rivals last winter and bought a defensive stake in AOL. It still has its search and advertising technology stationed on AOL's site. Google may also make its instant-messaging service interoperable with AOL's, the most popular in the world.

Ally or annex?

With AOL lost to the enemy, what of a deal between Microsoft and either Yahoo! or eBay? Justin Post, an analyst at Merrill Lynch, said recently that Microsoft's “acquisition probability” is now so high that it may soon start pushing up the share prices of eBay and Yahoo! Mr Post thinks that Microsoft is most likely to bid for Yahoo! This would help Microsoft strategically, he says. Others are not sure. “I don't see it as a terribly good merger,” says Mr Rashtchy. There would be big cultural differences between a media company and a software firm. He thinks that a merger of Yahoo! and eBay, on the other hand, might make sense because both live mainly from serving online communities.

Paul Saffo, a Silicon Valley analyst and a fellow of the Institute for the Future, a research group, thinks that any merger between the three middle powers would be a “grand dramatic gesture” that would only hasten their decline. AOL's merger with Time Warner in 2000 is the relevant warning from recent history. Big mergers also run counter to a number of other trends on the internet today, which are collectively known as “Web 2.0”. “This is the age of mash-ups not mergers, open over closed,” says Mr Saffo, referring to the open internet standards that allow users to combine, or “mash” services.

Another argument against full-blown mergers is that the bigger and more self-absorbed the established powers become, the less likely they are to spot new insurgencies—start-ups such as YouTube, an online video site, for instance, or MySpace. Their equivalents in Prince Metternich's day were the nationalist and liberal movements that troubled the continental monarchies, and erupted in the revolutions of 1848—forcing Metternich to resign and flee into exile in Britain.

.travel registry launches .travel search portal

August 18, 2006 | Hotelmarketing.com

Since the introduction of the .travel Top Level Domain six months ago, thousands of destinations and tourism-related companies have registered their domains in the .travel Internet space reserved exclusively for travel and tourism entities.

In order to own a .travel Internet domain name, applicants must be “authenticated” to verify that they are legitimate travel companies and legally entitled to use the domain names. This authentication process is intended to eliminate the common practice of cyber squatting that has made searching the .com space so frustrating for consumers seeking accurate information and legitimate suppliers.

As an online research tool, search.travel delivers qualified search results from the entire World Wide Web, giving priority to destinations and businesses that have been authenticated. By using search.travel, consumers can now find all things travel related while saving valuable time and gaining peace of mind, because priority placement is given to “.travel authenticated” registrants, eliminating the need for consumers to sift through pages of irrelevant results or visit web sites that may not be reputable.

Tralliance Corporation, the .travel Registry, developed the search engine to benefit both domain holders and consumers at large. “There are thousands of cyber squatters in the .com space today,” says Edward A. Cespedes, CEO of Tralliance Corporation. “And with billions of dollars changing hands through online commerce in the travel arena, it stands to reason that consumers are concerned about the validity of search results and the credibility of companies trying to attract their attention online.”

A .travel domain assures consumers that a travel service provider has been rigorously authenticated. And as an extension of the .travel initiative, search.travel offers the public a new vehicle to find these legitimate travel products and services quickly.

“Tralliance is delivering consumers the next generation of travel search on the web by adding a layer of security that is unavailable in the .com search world,” said Cespedes.

National Advertising Campaign to Promote search.travel

To introduce the new search portal, .travel will launch a national advertising campaign in August. The campaign will consist of both 15 and 30-second television spots designed to visually reflect the diverse travel destinations and entities currently registered in the .travel Internet space.

The television campaign, which will initially run in the U.S., but may expand to target other parts of the world, has the potential to reach 100 million people in 35 million homes and will be complemented by significant online advertising. The online campaign is expected to generate nearly 10 million visits to the search.travel website.

“Our goal is to drive consumers to the new search.travel site, but at the same time we need to clearly let consumers know that a whole new world of legitimate travel search results awaits them in the .travel space,” says Cespedes. “We believe the new TV spots will pique consumer’s interest to try search.travel, and once they see the advantages, make it their online research tool of choice.”

Related Link: search.travel

Thursday, August 17, 2006

China International Travel Service signs distribution partner

August 17, 2006 | Hotelmarketing.com

Triton Distribution Systems, Inc., a next generation web-based travel services distributor, has entered into an agreement with China International Travel Service (CITS), China’s largest and most influential tourist enterprise group, to help bolster China’s rapidly growing travel industry.

Triton’s web-based travel distribution and procurement solutions will enable 70,000 travel agents and tour operators around the world to book and sell complete itineraries within China. With a network of more that 1,400 agents and tour companies nationwide, CITS has hosted more than 10 million international visitors to China.

CITS and its affiliates will use Triton’s ReservationExpert to book both international and domestic travel products. With Triton systems CITS agents will be able to create complete overseas itineraries for travelers, including both domestic and foreign segments, from any international airport in China - an industry first.

A New Chapter in Sino-American Travel

No newcomer to the Chinese travel market, Triton chairman, CEO and founder Gregory Lykiardopoulos made history more than a quarter century ago when he helped negotiate the first regularly-scheduled flights by a U.S. airline to Beijing. He says the agreement signed with CITS marks a new chapter in the Sino-American travel industry.

“We are honored to be working with China’s largest and most prestigious travel organization to bring the efficiency and economy of our Internet-based solutions to the nation’s booming international and domestic travel sectors,” said Lykiardopoulos. “Through our partnership with CITS, we will make travel to, from and within China readily available to more people worldwide than ever before.”

According to CITS, the Chinese travel industry is experiencing rapid expansion and has become a key point of growth in the nation’s burgeoning economy. The China National Tourism Administration expects 130 million overseas visitors this year, an increase of eight percent over the previous year.

“Working with partners like Triton Distribution Systems, our goal is to make CITS the premiere travel agency for both foreign and domestic travelers by developing and distributing a travel inventory that showcases the multifaceted natural, cultural and historical attractions of our vast and beautiful nation,” said Mr. Hao, Ge Hua, General Manager of E-commerce. “Triton’s tools and technologies will help us bring China and the rest of the world closer together.”

The agreement signed by CITS and Triton comes at a most opportune time, as the Games of the XXIX Olympiad - Beijing 2008 will be hosted in the nation’s capital. The Summer Olympics are expected to bring an additional two million travelers, many of them first-time visitors to China. CITS is working with Triton and other global travel companies, including American Express, to ensure that travel agencies and tour operators can efficiently package and sell compelling itineraries for foreign and domestic travelers.

Related Link: Triton Distribution Systems

Travelocity targets loyalty programs with "Book with Points"

August 17, 2006 | Hotelmarketing.com

Travelocity has signed an exclusive agreement with reward-management portal Points.com to develop “Book with Points,” a new product that lets loyalty-program members use miles and points from their various reward programs to directly book travel services.

With this product, Points International is set to tap the estimated $15 billion North American/European reward travel industry.

“Book with Points” will allow loyalty program members access to Travelocity’s online booking engine. They will use points or miles to book and purchase the travel reward, exactly as if they were purchasing their travel with cash rather than loyalty points and miles.